also a relevant question is how his opponent with a 1700 rating could lose
he only play 5|0 so, anyone can lose.
also a relevant question is how his opponent with a 1700 rating could lose
he only play 5|0 so, anyone can lose.
also a relevant question is how his opponent with a 1700 rating could lose
he only play 5|0 so, anyone can lose.
i totally missed that
Would like to play with it and to prove that that opening defies the basic principles of the opening.
" basic principles of the opening " ?
- first time hear about such a thing
Yes. I see in the third one the king needed to move to swing the queen over.
I am not very familiar with all language nuances, but " to swing the queen over " sounds nice
Would like to play with it and to prove that that opening defies the basic principles of the opening.
" basic principles of the opening " ?
- first time hear about such a thing
First off, this opening is a varition of Barnes Opening (as white) and Barnes Defense (as black). There is nothing wrong with the opening, however few play it as it can easily be locked down when the opponent simply developes normally.
and as black
I hope this helps you develope your variation. Good Luck!
(...) There is nothing wrong with the opening, (...)
You mean... Except that it almost loses by force ?
(...) There is nothing wrong with the opening, (...)
You mean... Except that it almost loses by force ?
There is nothing wrong with the opening when you play it correctly, however I do not think the variation presented will work at higher levels of game play.
Since the initial move of f3 cuts off the knight from its natural position, a new position needs to be made. Also, since f3 does not open any lines for bishops or queen, developement will be slow, but possible. I do however agree that the barnes opening is one (if not THE) weekest opening that is still played. That being said, club level players probably have not played against it before and can easily be tripped up.
Daeth is that you?
I think, not yet, though, to say i am alive will be exaggerated .
Wait...
How did you get your rating of 1737, if you believe this kind of thing is remotely playable ?
Believe me, i myself wonder about this.
Of the twenty possible first moves in the game of chess, author and grandmaster Edmar Mednis argues that 1.f3 is the worst.[1] The move does exert influence over the central square e4, but the same or more ambitious goals can be achieved with almost any other first move. 1.f3 develops no pieces, opens no lines for pieces, and actually hinders the development of White's kingside knight by denying it its most natural square f3. 1.f3 also weakens White's king side pawn structure, opens the e1-h4 diagonal against White's uncastled king, and opens the e1-a5 diagonal against White's potential king-side castling position.[1]
Since 1.f3 is a poor move, it is not played often. Nonetheless, it is probably not the rarest opening move. After 1.f3 e5 some players even continue with the nonsensical 2.Kf2, which is sometimes called the Wandering King Opening, The Hammerschlag, or the Pork Chop Opening. One example of this was Simon Williams against Martin Simons in the last round of the British championship tournament in 1999 where Williams had nothing to play for.[2]
Despite its obvious deficiencies, 1.f3 does not lose the game for White. Black can secure a comfortable advantage by the normal means – advancing central pawns and rapidly developing pieces to assert control over central squares.
wikipedia
you were trolling anyway, but for those who dont know that, i posted this.
Who is that Mednis, and what he understands ?! Bobby gave him a game to win, to enjoy, and he decided he understands chess.
you were trolling anyway, but for those who dont know that, i posted this.
Who is that Mednis, and what he understands ?! Bobby gave him a game to win, to enjoy, and he decided he understands chess.
ofc Edmar Mednis isnt the greatest authority on earth and writing the book how to beat bobby fischer was just hilarious, but this was the only thing i could find about the opening
Of the twenty possible first moves in the game of chess, author and grandmaster Edmar Mednis argues that 1.f3 is the worst.[1] The move does exert influence over the central square e4, but the same or more ambitious goals can be achieved with almost any other first move. 1.f3 develops no pieces, opens no lines for pieces, and actually hinders the development of White's kingside knight by denying it its most natural square f3. 1.f3 also weakens White's king side pawn structure, opens the e1-h4 diagonal against White's uncastled king, and opens the e1-a5 diagonal against White's potential king-side castling position.[1]
Since 1.f3 is a poor move, it is not played often. Nonetheless, it is probably not the rarest opening move. After 1.f3 e5 some players even continue with the nonsensical 2.Kf2, which is sometimes called the Wandering King Opening, The Hammerschlag, or the Pork Chop Opening. One example of this was Simon Williams against Martin Simons in the last round of the British championship tournament in 1999 where Williams had nothing to play for.[2]
Despite its obvious deficiencies, 1.f3 does not lose the game for White. Black can secure a comfortable advantage by the normal means – advancing central pawns and rapidly developing pieces to assert control over central squares.
wikipedia
What about the retard king variation 1.f3.d5 2.Kf2? That develops the king. Of course it's not very good
also a relevant question is how his opponent with a 1700 rating could lose