The computer gliched black to move not white.
New Roy Lopez
Sort:
Are you sure it's White to move?
Also "Roy Lopez"... a priest born of an English father (possibly Roy is the father's name, too?) and a Spanish mother? 
As I said could not figure out how to make it black to move so I posted another post saying black to move.
Okay, seriously now... yeah, both sides seem to have a playable position after some fairly respectable moves. White for choice.
White gains center with d4
that's not Roy Lopez -- this is Roy Lopez:
and you've got to admit he's kind of hunky in a 'omg-button-your-shirt-eeewww-a-medallion-and-omg-your-hair-is-freaking-me-out-eyes-glazed-by-veterinary-medecine-aaaargh-get-away-get-away-help-I think-he's-following me' way...
++++++++++++++++++++++
but spencer -- about your new ruy lopez -- it would help to post it with the move order you use...
The 3...d6 pawn push is the Steinitz defense -- 4.Nc3 is a sideline I don't know how it's evaluated -- the mainline is 4.d4
Looking into the Steinitz defense for this thread ( + I'm into all things Steinitz, these days) I came across this very wicked trap, the Tarrasch Trap of the Steinitz defense... man this is diabolical -- a very natural move by Black leads to losing the exchange many moves later.
no on both it goes (whites moves) e4 Nf3 Nc3 Bb5.check out that variation develops a knight first so next move start pawn structure!
What do you guys think new,has it already been created,what? I created this new version of the Roy Lopez because everyone knew the old version.It has won some lost some just like any other.