I am HATING the toothless scandinavian and want to "reverse king's gambit" (rousseau, luccini, calabrese, jaenisch/schliemann etc.) so bad! the scandinavian is very positional and not very forcing.
if you play king's gambit too... stick with that, and play "BDGs" against the french, caro and scandinavian
alapin diemer gambit:
MISTAKING that exact formation for the carokann maroczy fantasy variation I was doing terrible in resulted in instant butt kicking stats simply follow king's gambit's "old faithful"...
Nf3/Bc4 & a semi-open f file all barreling in towards Bxf7+ tactics.
again... planning Bc4 and you will OWN the MAJORITY of caros who think they'll be getting away with the usual Nf6/Bg4 pin only to get Bxf7+ed! LOL I have near 2:1 stats in this!
everyone else does better with the 3.Nc3 main line, but I must be weak with my queenside knight because i tend to do badly in openings where queen's knight goes out before the king's one. as a scandinavian player, I never see any BDGs. they are super rare. less sound tennison gambit is much more popular, but still very rare
I like all 3 BDGs for being transpositional and similar to king's gambit targetswise. it's like one system to fight 3 openings to me.
smith morra gambit is always solid, though these days, your opponents are much better booked than a decade ago
the krejcik alekhine isn't the most sound opening, but it's fun wrecking black's castle with king chasing potential
with a temporary lead in development. I'm not into pawns, so "big center" attacks (3x side by side pawns on 4th rank) aren't for me like the 4 pawns attack here
what I'm REALLY loving as black though is no longer stonewalling 1.d4, but just ripping those pawns I hate for being in my way out and getting mobile right away with then englund gambit > hartlaub/charlick variation. i get 85% accuracy more often than not in it!
Just for the achievement