14712 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I just started playing the Caro-Kann and I ran into a problem in the main line of the classical variation:
In a recent game White surprised me with 7. Nh4 instead of the main line which is 7. h4. After Nh4 Black will lose the two Bishops and have a broken Kingside pawn structure. Does anyone know the best response to Nh4, and why it's not considered the main line??
The best response is a move that ignores it, because White is wasting time in order to accomplish an unnecessary goal.
But then what is Black's plan for castling since both sides have a compromised pawn structure?
What of Black's plans to castle? Just don't castle immediately. Don't become a target. In semi-open games such as these, it is usually best to hold off castling until the opponent's motives are seen.
Long term white will be better with the 2 bishops, but in return he has a lack in development and black needs to make use of this. Theoretically its probably equal, but white will have some practical squeezing chances. There is a similar line in the caro kann where white goes nh3 and then nf4 with the same idea. This line may not be the most played line, but it is a definitely playable sideline and you can't really avoid it.
I think the 2 bishop advantage is quite overrated in such a position, the bishops although with quite a bit of activity, can be blocked very easily with black's rock solid pawn structure. I would not mind playing black against anyone.
it's one of those positions where it is a theoretically fine to play, but practically white may have slightly more chances.
White has slightly more chances in a game with hardly any chances at all.
yes this is exactly what I am trying to say.
Completely harmless as White wastes valuable time in the opening to exchange a piece Black will end up trading sooner or later anyway.
Doubled pawns are only a weakness if they are also isolated or if the doubled pawn cripples a potential majority so a passed pawn can no longer be created. In this case, they give Black a half-open file for his Rook and he doesn't even have to spend a tempo moving his Rook onto it!
And as a matter of practice in the 4 ...Bf5 lines, Black ends up castling Queenside more often than not. It's not "compromised" in any real sense. Black will have to play ...Kb8, more than likely, but that is often the price of security after 0-0-0 for either side in any opening. Maybe he will have to play ...Bd6 before ...Kb8 but, again, that's a standard move in this line.
8/28/2016 - Invincible
by jeffreyni 2 minutes ago
why no chess in Olympics
by KenGeneQ 11 minutes ago
My new board is here!
by xjbvsjjbzjbds 32 minutes ago
by ChessOfPlayer 37 minutes ago
Chess.com worst website on the internet
by Twpsyn 39 minutes ago
by notmtwain 40 minutes ago
by whirling_dervish 48 minutes ago
Is my opponent a fake account?
by RedGirlZ 50 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by TheBlunderfulPlayer 56 minutes ago
8/25/2016 - Around The Way
by TheBlunderfulPlayer 57 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!