Queen's Gambit Accepted

Sort:
Avatar of pfren

Blah- blah- blah, the same shit all the time: When people are asked posting moves to prove their stupid claims, they open the bible instead.

Avatar of Fred-Splott

Am I wrong in thinking 8 ... N x d4 is won for black?

Avatar of Pacifique
Fred-Splott wrote:

Am I wrong in thinking 8 ... N x d4 is won for black?

Which position are you talking about?

Avatar of Pacifique
thehedgehog2000 wrote:

You're not in position to command him or tell him to shut up. I've met many chess players who I found considerate but woah I didn't know many other chess players were so mean. While telling other people to shut up you hurt them and you deserve to therefore feel like them. So put yourself in his shoes and stop being so obnoxious.

Are you able to discuss about the subject of this thread?

Avatar of Fred-Splott

Alexlaw, GM Konstantin Sakaev is one of the very best opening experts. Regarding some openings (Petroff, Grunfeld, QGA) he is far and away the best. If you don't agree with his judgement then, unfortunately, you are at fault. We don't believe blindly in anything but we are not stupid enough to challenge an opening theoretician's expert judgement.

Just follow your instinct and don't think for yourself.

Avatar of Fred-Splott

I think the major point of debate here to be whether judgment may be spelled judgement. All the rest is first-rate, of course.

Avatar of chapablanca2000
pfren wrote:
BrettGoodrich wrote:

Is there anybody whose first language is English who can translate this from the original Gibberish?

I can translate this to English, no problem (I have a Cambridge Proficiency in English), but quite unfortunately not to American- sorry for that.

Ouch! I'd like to respond, but I am suddenly doubtful about my ability to do so. I would attach a smiley or a "lol" to this post, but that might prove your point.