First of all, players of Bobby Fischer's generation would hold that e4 is the best first move on the chess board. Positional players probably prefer d4.
Secondly, in Queen's Gambit Accepted games most players of Black do not try to hold the pawn. There is really only one instance where they can successfully (and White must cooperate). You take the pawn and develop your pieces as fast as possible. That is the name of the game. The QGA became popular with such grandmasters as Nigel Short, Vishy Anand, Vassily Ivanchuk, Jan Timman, Robert Hubner, Jon Speelman, Max Dulgy and Patrick Wolf (according to Glenn Flear who plays it and who wrote a book on it). That would make it a clear choice. On the other hand the QGD it is Black who chooses the variations and has more choices of where to take it.
I believe that most QGD players do not know all the traps they can use in the Cambridge Springs Defense. I prefer it for Black. The QGD proper is not always allowed because White has a minority attack in the exchange variation at his disposal which is very restrictive. PAWN STRUCTURE CHESS, by Andy Soltis gives a good evaluation of the exchange variation and minority attack in the QGD.
Here is a quote from the Soltis book, "In the 1927 world championship match the Queen's Gambit Declined occured in 32 of the 34 games...the arrival of the Indian systems was a welcome change". Although I have never seen any of Kasparov's games with the Cambridge Springs Defense he apparently did a good job of recycling it.
Since d4 is probably white's best first move, along with d5 being black's, the queens gambit can and should occur quite often. If black accepts it, he can barely hold onto the extra pawn(he can but it is difficult). Do you think it is better to accept it, or decline it(and possibly use the lasker trap or elephant trap)?