Quick win in the Alekhine Defense (ft. transposition & blunders)

Sort:
Avatar of MikeGS27

Hi there! Today I want to show you an interesting way to punish this transposition which happens quite often in the Scandinavian Defense at 1300-1450 level. After 2.exd5, I always premove Nc3(bad habit), expecting Qxd5, which is the standard Scandinavian. In this game that I'm presenting, my opponent played 2.Nf6, transposing to the Alekhine Defense: Scandinavian Variation. Having premoved, I now had to come up with a solution. And I did.

This happened a few times in my blitz games and I've never thought of a plan against it until today. Now I will try to do this every time. It's not that good and it only works against low rated players but I don't care. 

 

 

After 3.Nxd5 I already saw the way to proceed. I played 4.Bc4, provoking my opponent to take the knight on c3. He did take but I instantly played 5.Qf3, creating a double attack (hitting his knight and threatening Qxf7+). 

I was pretty certain that his next move was going to be 5.Nd5, trying to save his knight and the f7 pawn. I guess he didn't see that I could then take with the bishop. His next move 6.e6 seems a bit strange to me, even though the engine says it's the best move.

At this point, white is already better and is about to grab a free b7 pawn. I was hoping he'd blunder Nc6 next but he didn't sad.png. He played 8.Nd7, logical wink.png. After this, I saw an opportunity to take advantage of the pin by bringing my knight to e5. The plan was Nxd7, forcing him to take back with the queen, then Qxa8, quite a simple trick which eventually happened. He resigned after that.

Avatar of blueemu

I've been recommending this line (including 5. Qf3) against the Scandinavian for months.

Against an Alekhine move-order, my pet line is in the Alburt variation:

 

Avatar of MikeGS27
blueemu wrote:

I've been recommending this line (including 5. Qf3) against the Scandinavian for months.

Against an Alekhine move-order, my pet line is in the Alburt variation:

 

 

Those white pawns look amazing! I never have that in my games. sad.png

Avatar of blueemu
rares495 wrote:
blueemu wrote:

I've been recommending this line (including 5. Qf3) against the Scandinavian for months.

Against an Alekhine move-order, my pet line is in the Alburt variation:

 

 

Those white pawns look amazing! I never have that in my games. 

The idea is NOT to try for a quick mate on f7... Black can defend against that. The idea is to play for a slower, more positional attack:

... and White will swing the a3-Rook over to the King-side, play some moves like b3 and Bd3 to solidify the position, and then take advantage of the fact that Black's King has only a couple of pieces defending it against an attack by White's entire army.

Of course, White is a piece down...

Avatar of MikeGS27

Those queen side pieces are practically non-existent. It's difficult for black to break that pawn chain & activate his pieces without sacrificing at least a minor piece. I'd play this as white all day long, seems like an easy path to victory. I think I'll give it a try someday.

Avatar of blueemu

Here was my most recent attempt (as White) to get that Knight-sac line vs the Alekhine's. Black didn't cooperate, though. Curiously, my b1-Knight ended up on f3 and my g1-Knight ended up on c3.

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/200865886

It was my other game (as Black) against the same opponent that was really spectacular, though.

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/200865884

Avatar of Elkapan11

Don't Alekhine players typically play 4... Bg4 before playing g6? 

Avatar of blueemu

Both variations are played, but yes, 4. ... Bg4 is roughly twice as common (5800+ games vs 2900+ games in the database).

That's why I mentioned "my pet line is in the Alburt variation"... the Alburt variation is 4. ... g6 instead of 4. ... Bg4.