Loomis wrote:
Nah, this one is more beautiful:
Out of every 10 games using qxf7 opening i win about 6-7 and lose about 3 games i can live with it ,now thanks for checking my game database and adding new games to my forum.
Qxf7 opening
Sort:
This has inspired me to go play bullet and get a 2000 rating.
It shows at least that someone out there has huge Cajones. HUGE. Qxf7 is the most entertaining thing I have seen on a board since Fischer stopped playing.
Thanks for the supporting words,and now for a game where minor pieces orchestra a good victory,this is another nice game.i son't know why opponenthand on to their queen when in the game of chess it is the king which has to be check mated
Here's another one where the minor pieces did a nice job, but in the end the heavy pieces get the job done.
Really strange this opening imagine where and all it takes the black king strangest mate
@ Loomis 
You had me in stiches. Great stuff.
For a second there, it looked like someone discovered a queen sac at the get go that is bullet proof. Sorry for the pun.
In the first game, all Black needed to do was push his center pawn two squares, d7-d5. He had many, many opportunities to do so, and the queen sac attack would have been a bust. Black can ALWAYS have a decisive advantage in just a few moves. It reminds me of my first months of play, getting mated by a queen and bishop on f7.
I'd like to see you try that on me in a 1 minute game :)
Musikamole wrote:
@ Loomis You had me in stiches. Great stuff.
For a second there, it looked like someone discovered a queen sac at the get go that is bullet proof. Sorry for the pun.
In the first game, all Black needed to do was push his center pawn two squares, d7-d5. He had many, many opportunities to do so, and the queen sac attack would have been a bust. Black can ALWAYS have a decisive advantage in just a few moves. It reminds me of my first months of play, getting mated by a queen and bishop on f7.
@ loomis you are doing a god job taking a dig at my qxf7 opening ,but it is still in BASIC stage with your criticism it is bound to improve.
ajedrecito wrote:
I laughed at the game in post 30. This shows the quality of play we see at the levels where ratings start with a 1 and the time control does too! I especially enjoyed 16...Qg2+.
Who can find mate in one for Black on move 16?
ajedrecito i can understand your point ,this opening really confuses the opponent ,i have played lot of handicap matches against houndini so some times i win lot of times i lose it entirely depends upon the style of play of my opponent,if my opponent are cautious waiting to unlease their queen power in end game then I mount pressure to lock his queen side.But people who are successfull against queen sacrifice opening are players who play with prudence and immediately mount attack on my king like on the weak e 2 square i will show how to play against my queen sacrifice opening now,the following pattern has worked like charm to defeat another player in this site who plays queen sacrifice opening.
Bizarre!
I love it! =)
Barefoot_Player
I don't know about anyone else, but I dream of an opponent opening like this even if it is on April 1st....bring it on!
Madgeniusguy wrote:
Musikamole wrote:
@ Loomis You had me in stiches. Great stuff.
For a second there, it looked like someone discovered a queen sac at the get go that is bullet proof. Sorry for the pun.
In the first game, all Black needed to do was push his center pawn two squares, d7-d5. He had many, many opportunities to do so, and the queen sac attack would have been a bust. Black can ALWAYS have a decisive advantage in just a few moves. It reminds me of my first months of play, getting mated by a queen and bishop on f7.
@ loomis you are doing a god job taking a dig at my qxf7 opening ,but it is still in BASIC stage with your criticism it is bound to improve.
In Bullet, I guess anything is possible. As Black, I would be completely surprised by Qxf7, so, unless my tactics are spot on in a really fast game with an exposed king, for me it would be 3 0, I could see myself getting into trouble.
In war there is the element of surprise, but sacrificing your stongest soldier? I don't know. It just can't be good. Still, your games are creative and fun to watch.
Please don't misunderstand. I like your topic. It's a good read. Carry on. 
BTW - Does anyone play an unorthodox bishop sac in bullet to expose the enemy king? I'd imagine that the winning chances for White would be better than a queen sac. Please post a game. Thanks!
Musikamole wrote:
Madgeniusguy wrote:
Musikamole wrote:
@ Loomis You had me in stiches. Great stuff.
For a second there, it looked like someone discovered a queen sac at the get go that is bullet proof. Sorry for the pun.
In the first game, all Black needed to do was push his center pawn two squares, d7-d5. He had many, many opportunities to do so, and the queen sac attack would have been a bust. Black can ALWAYS have a decisive advantage in just a few moves. It reminds me of my first months of play, getting mated by a queen and bishop on f7.
@ loomis you are doing a god job taking a dig at my qxf7 opening ,but it is still in BASIC stage with your criticism it is bound to improve.
In Bullet, I guess anything is possible. As Black, I would be completely surprised by Qxf7, so, unless my tactics are spot on in a really fast game with an exposed king, for me it would be 3 0, I could see myself getting into trouble.
In war there is the element of surprise, but sacrificing your stongest soldier? I don't know. It just can't be good. Still, your games are creative and fun to watch.
Please don't misunderstand. I like your topic. It's a good read. Carry on.
BTW - Does anyone play an unorthodox bishop sac in bullet to expose the enemy king? I'd imagine that the winning chances for White would be better than a queen sac. Please post a game. Thanks!
No worries couple of cool games to show off.
Yeah people do sacrifice a bishop for f7 pawn guess it is fried liver attack.
I ran this game throughthe engine and after the last move exactly neither players had any advantage it was 0.03
My own (terrible) game using Qxf7 opening:
Ok First spolier warning this is a pretty average game where opponent made some serious blunders he missed a couple of forks.
BWV542 wrote:
My own (terrible) game using Qxf7 opening:
You aren't losing when you are learning
Nah, this one is more beautiful: