Scandinavian: 2. ...Qxd5 or 2. ... Nf6

Sort:
testaaaaa

know not much about the nf6 scandi but im intrigued now maybe i check out smerdon happy.png

g_darling

d0su wrote:

GM Smerdon's book on the Scandinavian is what rekindled my passion for chess a few years ago, and for the first time made me want to actually study the game. I enjoy his views on of practical chances vs. engine objectivity, and his results-based "part time grandmaster" approach. So it should be obvious what my recommendation is.

(Hint: it starts with "P"...)

(and ends with "ortugese")

Smerdon's book seems to be held in high regards by everyone! I'll have to invest in it

g_darling

BobbyPhisher960 wrote:

g_darling wrote:
E4 and Scandinavian players. Interested in your thoughts on these two moves and which you prefer.

I apologize for ruining of the thread. My recommendation is 3... Qd8 line.

No worries man! Qd8 is quite interesting, it always seemed counterintuitive to me but I never thought of it as a Qa5 line but saving a tempi later.

WCPetrosian

The book titled The 3...Qd8 Scandinavian Simple And Strong by Daniel Lowinger is helpful. It only covers 3 Nc3 Qd8, does not cover when white deviates with something such as 3 Nf3 or 3 d4.

testaaaaa

just watched smerdons Nf6 scandinavian presentation video for 50 moves on youtube for someone wondering why its called portuguese variation because Rui Damaso checkmated a chinese GM in 13 moves untill now the quickest checkmate on high level with the black pieces lol

subhankhurram

I normally play 2. Qxd4

testaaaaa

smerdon gets forced checkmate sequences after 15 moves against gms who play the refutation line and know that he plays the portugese thats incredible

testaaaaa

would you give me a few minutes if there is obviously a problem with the pgn

testaaaaa

i think it doesnt work because its 4 games in one pgn

 

testaaaaa

 

testaaaaa

 

testaaaaa

 

testaaaaa

 

SmyslovFan
poucin wrote:

As white, 2...Nf6 is very easy to play, while Qxd5 is more complicated.

When i see 2...Nf6 on the board, it is like "thank u"!

But 2...Qxd5 doesnt define the game, as u can follow with Qa5, Qd6, Qd8 which lead to different positions and styles of play.

That's an interesting take on the position. 2...Qxd5 is optically more committal than 2...Nf6, but I think you're probably right. The caveat of course is that there are a number of transpositions and similarities possible after all three Q moves. But then again, those similarities can be a snare to confuse White. 

I accept your statement that 2...Qd5 may be more challenging for White, but bear in mind that top players, including Carlsen himself, have played both. I don't think one is objectively inferior to the other, just that 2...Qd5 may give Black more options later.

testaaaaa


John Emms wrote three books on the scandinavian but after this game he decided to give Smerdon a book contract