Sicilian, Four Knights Variation

Sort:
SteelWheels

Would you take this variation? If so, why?

Four Knights Variation: 4...Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6

Chess zhor 22.png
Chess zver 22.png a8 rd b8 __ c8 bd d8 qd e8 kd f8 bd g8 __ h8 rd Chess zver 22.png
a7 pd b7 pd c7 __ d7 pd e7 __ f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 __ b6 __ c6 nd d6 __ e6 pd f6 nd g6 __ h6 __
a5 __ b5 __ c5 __ d5 __ e5 __ f5 __ g5 __ h5 __
a4 __ b4 __ c4 __ d4 nl e4 pl f4 __ g4 __ h4 __
a3 __ b3 __ c3 nl d3 __ e3 __ f3 __ g3 __ h3 __
a2 pl b2 pl c2 pl d2 __ e2 __ f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 __ c1 bl d1 ql e1 kl f1 bl g1 __ h1 rl
Chess zhor 22.png
The Four Knights Variation: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6

The Four Knights Variation is mainly used as a way of getting into the main line Sveshnikov Variation, reached after 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bf4 e5 8.Bg5 a6 9.Na3 b5. The point of this move order is to avoid lines such as the Rossolimo Variation (1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5), or 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Nd5 d6 7.Nd5, which are possible in the standard Sveshnikov move order. On the other hand, in the Four Knights move order, White acquires the extra option of 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.e5 Nd5 8.Ne4, so White is not obliged to enter the Sveshnikov.

If Black is not aiming for the Sveshnikov, the main alternative is to play 6...Bb4 in reply to 6.Ndb5. Then 7.a3 Bxc3+ 8.Nxc3 d5 9.exd5 exd5 leads to a position where Black has given up the two bishops but has active pieces and the possibility of playing ...d5-d4.

GrooveHard

wow...? (pushes up glasses) I'm confused?

CarlMI

If you haven't noticed yet, SteelWheels posts a mass of these opening clips.  Why, I don't know.  Self promotion, a desire for points, whatever.  Its along the level of those who go to Wikipedia, copy an opening entry and paste the thing here.  Serves no purpose, wastes bandwidth, pushes real questions down the list into obscurity as most people don't go past the first couple pages of posts.  So yes, the original post, and my response are simply wastes of time.

SteelWheels
CarlMI wrote:

If you haven't noticed yet, SteelWheels posts a mass of these opening clips.  Why, I don't know.  Self promotion, a desire for points, whatever.  Its along the level of those who go to Wikipedia, copy an opening entry and paste the thing here.  Serves no purpose, wastes bandwidth, pushes real questions down the list into obscurity as most people don't go past the first couple pages of posts.  So yes, the original post, and my response are simply wastes of time.


Care for a Sicilian game? (",)

CarlMI

No thanks.  I only play tournaments and I'm at my limit anyway.  Even so I'm experimenting with other than Sicilian these days.  MY point is, rather than cut and paste from Wiki or where ever, put up something original or a real question.  If you want to C&P openings why not do it in a blog or article rather than clutter the forums?  You get very little response to your posting of other people's work as it is.

SteelWheels
CarlMI wrote:

No thanks.  I only play tournaments and I'm at my limit anyway.  Even so I'm experimenting with other than Sicilian these days.  MY point is, rather than cut and paste from Wiki or where ever, put up something original or a real question.  If you want to C&P openings why not do it in a blog or article rather than clutter the forums?  You get very little response to your posting of other people's work as it is.


Others have expressed their appreciation for the posts.

Different strokes for different people, I guess.

I appreciate your suggestions though; and all the best in your non-Sicilian experiments.