Sicilian, Kalashnikov Variation

Sort:
SteelWheels

Would you take this variation? If so, why?

Kalashnikov Variation: 4...e5

Chess zhor 22.png
Chess zver 22.png a8 rd b8 __ c8 bd d8 qd e8 kd f8 bd g8 nd h8 rd Chess zver 22.png
a7 pd b7 pd c7 __ d7 pd e7 __ f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 __ b6 __ c6 nd d6 __ e6 __ f6 __ g6 __ h6 __
a5 __ b5 __ c5 __ d5 __ e5 pd f5 __ g5 __ h5 __
a4 __ b4 __ c4 __ d4 nl e4 pl f4 __ g4 __ h4 __
a3 __ b3 __ c3 __ d3 __ e3 __ f3 __ g3 __ h3 __
a2 pl b2 pl c2 pl d2 __ e2 __ f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 nl c1 bl d1 ql e1 kl f1 bl g1 __ h1 rl
Chess zhor 22.png
The Kalashnikov Variation: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e5

The Kalashnikov Variation is a close relative of the Sveshnikov Variation, and is sometimes known as the Neo-Sveshnikov. The move 4...e5 has had a long history; Louis-Charles Mahé de La Bourdonnais used it in his matches against Alexander McDonnell in 1834, and it was also popular for a short time in the 1940s. These earlier games focused on the Lowenthal Variation with 4...e5 5.Nb5 a6 6.Nd6+ Bxd6 7.Qxd6 Qf6, where Black gives up the two bishops to achieve a lead in development. However, the move fell out of use once it was determined that White kept the advantage in these lines.

Only in the late 1980s did Black players revive 4...e5 with the intention of meeting 5.Nb5 with 5...d6: this is the Kalashnikov Variation proper. The ideas in this line are similar to those in the Sveshnikov - Black accepts a backward pawn on d6 and weakens the d5-square but gains time by chasing the knight. The difference between the two variations is that Black has not developed his knight to f6 and White has not brought his knight out to c3, so both players have extra options. Black may forego ...Nf6 in favour of ...Ne7, e.g. after 6.N1c3 a6 7.Na3 b5 8.Nd5 Nge7, which avoids White's plan of Bg5 and Bxf6 to inflict doubled f-pawns on Black. Or, Black can delay bringing out the knight in favour of playing ...Be7-g5 or a quick ...f5. On the other hand, White has the option of 6.c4, which solidifies his grip on d5 and clamps down on ...b5, but leaves the d4-square slightly weak.

Elubas

I always wondered what the advantages of the kalashnikov were compared to the sveshnikov.

contrapunctus

I would play the Sveshnikov because as stated, the Kalashnikov allowws white to play c4 and get a maroczy bind which slows the pace of the game down and it gets boring.

Grandcapi

The chinese GM Li Chao plays it with ...Qe7 after Nd6+/Bd6/Qd6 with good results. 

fairytalelion

Yes, but... you are replying to an 11yrs question?! As I understand... the sveishnikov has since become very popular and the kalishnikov not so much.

Uhohspaghettio1

I usually play c4 against the Sveshnikov anyway. Technically it may not be the best but I usually get a great position and don't care. 

JonasDillen

I would definitely play it, it's a killer opening

SwordofSouls2023

bump

sndeww

kalashnikov is epic

tygxc

After publishing his 1989 book The Sicilian Pelikan Sveshnikov considered the Sveshnikov variation unplayable: totally analysed to a draw. Sveshnikov has played 50 games with the Kalashnikov B32 and only 38 with the Sveshnikov B33.

FoxWithNekoEars
Uživatel B1ZMARK napsal:

kalashnikov is epic

yeah.. I have pleyed that few times in otb and its pretty interesting..
even when d5 is weak, black can create a solid countreplay by many (and sometimes kinda weird) ways..