sodium attack
Sort:
Jan 21, 2016
0
#2
This is just a scared horsey that isn't worth its salt. But the good part is it will stop the Benko Gambit....they say.
Jan 21, 2016
0
#3
I must say tho'. Anyone playing the Sodium Attack is like playing with Water....explosive !
.
Someone looks SALTY! :D haha
Jan 21, 2016
0
#14
Na + H2O = Ka....BOOM !!
(So don't wash the dishes w/ a Sodium Ring....just saying)
....
....
Jan 21, 2016
0
#16
Fiveofswords wrote:
this opening is only possible because of white privilege. The corresponding 'pepper' opening loses by force and is also frequently shot and killed by the police.
You know, I promised myself I would be nicer to clearly stupid people. it looks like I am going to fail.
Impress me, without looking it up on the internet, just what do you know about Robert Durkin and his opening 1.Na3?
I would hazzard a guess, very little. All you do is post the same old myopic crap. In another words "Move X sucks because it does not match my dogmatic view of the game".
Simply put, you are the worse kind of clown....
Jan 22, 2016
0
#17
Fiveofswords wrote:
lol...you are cruel to yourself when you speak. to answer your question...i know nothing about 1na3. and i never will. even if it became the most common move i ever saw i still would never bother to study it at all. much of my chess understanding comes from logic. logically i know what 1na3 is. white decided to play this move...very important to play quickly so that 2 nb1 is prepared...and obviously more important than silly moves like d4 or e4.
Where does one start?
Perfect place would be "i know nothing about 1na3. and i never will" which begs the question why are you even on a forum posting any sort of a comment, banal or otherwise?
Oh wait..."much of my chess understanding comes from logic".
The problem with you is that your so called "logic" is flawed in that it is based upon a singular concept on how you perceive that the game should be played...In another words, dogma. Logic is supposed to provide a valid argument but when it’s thought processes are based on subjective reasoning, it becomes little more than an extension of the dogma upon which it is based.
And as for:
i think that white should be given the choice of starting the game without one of his pawns so that people like hadron could expore the fascinating ideas behind a wider variety of wonderful openings.
Even when you try be a smart arse, your myopic dogma gets in the way. White already has a choice (all be it a small one) to start without pawns. Durkin's attack not withstanding 1.Nf3 and 1.Nc3 spring to mind.
And one last thing, I suggest you expore a wonderful invention called "Spell Check".
Have a nice day
HTH
This is not recommended