Strange Sicilian variation (2.Nc3)

Sort:
SMcKer

So, I was playing a game against a strongish player and when I played my all-time favorite line, the sicilain - planning to enter the dragon - when on the second move, after 1.e4,c5 2. Nc3!?? After that I was stumped, I don't use the database so I thought about it for a while and decided that 2. ... d6 would be a reasonable move, planning to transpose into a classic sicilian. After deliberation afterwards, I think that the stronger move would have been 2. ... Nc6.

I would like to hear your opinions on this, the opening that followed was interesting and one that I don't class as very well played on my part as I missed a crucial move (I have already posted the full game). 

The opening left me in a strongish positon, I include lines that I class as slightly stronger moves for both sides in the opening as I feel that - although no major mistakes were made - there were opportunities to improve positions slighly for black and to equalise for white:

StewartWilliam

Nc3 is not the most usual continuation, but its not that strange.  White can play nc3 to throw black off, then take play towards a normal sicilian with nf3 and d4.  Also, he can intend to play a bb5 (+).  Most typical, white plays nc3 intending to take play towards a Closed Sicilian formation - usually by playing the follow moves/plan - e4, nc3, g3, bg2, and something like nge2, h3, f4 and g4.

Black usually replies to the Closed Sicilian by playing actively on the center and the kingside, along the lines of nc6, e6, and d5 and maybe with rb8, b5 - b4.  I recommend checking out some old games by Kasparov and Fischer to get a more thorough understanding of blacks plans.  

The Closed Sicilian for white is rarely employed at top level, however is fairly common among club players.  It is not the most aggressive opening choice for white, however is definitely very solid and black often has a problem with coping with the change of pace from a normal open sicilian.

Will Stewart - NM - onlinechesslessons.net

SMcKer

Thanks...

I wasn't saying it was bad, just that I have neve played it before. Wink

SMcKer

Sorry guys, I didn't mean to sound harsh...

And I admit that I do miss moves so I was interested in finding out how you guys played it and ways I could play against it better... Wink

Emmott

It's not strange, it's the closed variation ;)

Atos
Estragon wrote:

Yes, it is just either a move-order feint or the introduction to the Closed Sicilian.

The CS was extremely rare until Boris Spassky retooled it and used it effectively in the Candidates' Matches vs Geller and Larsen in 1968.  


Extremely rare... hm...

It was used by Smyslov before that, and even in the WCH match of 1954.

blake78613

White can either play the closed Sicilian with an early d4, or he can play Nge2 which allows him to transpose back to the open Sicilian if he likes the position with d4. 

SMcKer

I admit that I made a mistake by calling it strange. I said it because I personally have never played against it so I wanted to find out more about it, that's all

Dragec

After Nc3 Nc6, f4 (grand prix attack) is also a usual continuation.

Atos

That is right, so there are three possibilities with 2.Nc3:

1. Closed Sicilian

2. Grand Prix Attack

3. Open Sicilian by transposition

SMcKer

Thanks guys...
I am trying to improve my sic. play as it is my only real defence to E4, your help is appreciatedd. 

TicklyTim

When deciding what to play vs 2.Nc3 need to be wary of transpositon back to open sicilian with either 3.Nf3/Nge2 & 4.d4.


Also to consider is that 3.Bc4 has more bite after 2...d6