Muzio Gambit?
Super attacking/sacrificing opening

Muzio Gambit?
Thanks for the idea. I'll take a look at it and analyse it, however I have heard it's losing by force but I've never analysed so I'm going to do that.
Thanks again for the idea.

Muzio Gambit?
I put the position on the board an the evaluation bar only said -0.69 so I'm going to analyse it deeper tomorrow.
Thanks again for the suggestion.
Muzio Gambit is certainly one.
Also look up the Cochrane gambit, White sacrifices a Knight on f7 early on in the Petrovs Defence, winning two pawns and getting a strong center. Stockfish actually drew this as White vs Leela, so not as unsound as one may think.
If it's for a fantasy book does it matter if it's losing by force? I mean it can be very hard for Black to defend. Inaccuracies are part of Chess...

Muzio Gambit is certainly one.
Also look up the Cochrane gambit, White sacrifices a Knight on f7 early on in the Petrovs Defence, winning two pawns and getting a strong center. Stockfish actually drew this as White vs Leela, so not as unsound as one may think.
If it's for a fantasy book does it matter if it's losing by force? I mean it can be very hard for Black to defend. Inaccuracies are part of Chess...
Thanks for the idea of the Cochrane, I'll look into it and try and find a line that would work.
In regards to losing by force, I just don't want it to be a lost position from the opening. I don't mind having a few inaccuracy here and there, but I don't want there to be an easy win for one side and have to blunder something to make it equal.
Thanks again for the suggestion.

Most lines where one side always sacs (as part of the line) is winning for one side or the other
True, but as you said it's most, not all. I'm looking for one of those openings.
Thanks though.

Peresypkin's Sacrifice Variation of Svenshinikov
Thnks for the two ideas. I really like the idea of the Peresypkin's Sacrifice so I'm going to analyse that one a bit further.
In regards to the corkscrew, I put it on the board and the evaluation was over +3 so I'm going to use another one but thanks again for the ideas.

Halloween is coming up in about a week so... Halloween Gambit!!
Thanks for the idea. I forgot about this one! I'm going to take a deeper look into it.
Thanks again.

Muzio Gambit?
I think I'm going to go with your idea.
I found a line that I really like. It's not done yet but there is another sacrifice and a temporary one as well.
Thanks again for the suggestion.

Muzio Gambit?
I think I'm going to go with your idea.
I found a line that I really like. It's not done yet but there is another sacrifice and a temporary one as well.
Thanks again for the suggestion.
I decided the game will go like this:
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions.

The sad thing is not many people play kings gambit accepted, much less as g5
I know. But thankfully it's sound for both side so I can use it in my book and any chess players who read it can enjoy something they won't see every day.
I'm probably going to have another game appear later in the story/next book if I write one, in which case I'm going to seriously consider your Peresypkin's sacrifice variation of Svenshinikov. Thanks again fr the idea.
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a super attacking/sacrificing openings for a fantasy book that I'm writing.
Does anyone know any lines that are interesting for a chess player who reads the book?
Either side of the board works, but I'm looking for a something that's isn't losing by force if you sacrifice.
Silent-Raven
P.S I wasn't even thinking of agamator when I said hello everyone. I noticed it after but it's my normal speech pattern so I'm not going to change it.