19060 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Recently i have been thinking about starting to play the belgrade gambit (1.e4 e4 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5!? is one move order, but the gambit soundness is not the main topic here) of the four knights, and i was wondering about what might be the best move order to reach it.
Practically speaking, i am undecided between 2.Nc3 and 2.Nf3.
My understanding is that 2.Nc3 has the added bonus of giving white extra ideas against the philidor-like 2...d6, such as an early f4 which might prove quite challenging for black. 2.Nf3 instead allows black to play a regular philidor. The petroff is avoided with both move orders. Other that this i really don't know.
Is there anybody out there who has experience in the vienna/4Ks and knows something about the various sidelines? Does black have some extra options against the 2.Nc3 move order? Or it is really just a matter of tastes?
Thanks in advance!
I'm not sure it makes much difference, except as you say that the Vienna move-order gives you some flexibility, by allowing f4 against some black passive set-ups.
I noticed 2.Nc3 g6 is playable though, but I doubt you'll meet it very often
2.Nf3 I think is best as that virtually forces Nc6 which you'll get most of the time. maybe you'll get some 2...d6 games though. Then simply 3.Nc3 when Nf6 is the best. There are other moves but they are trickier to play for Black than White. You can also sidestep any Petroffs this way.
Thanks for the information! Avoiding the not so uncommon Philidor probably outweights the disadvantage of allowing this rare variation...but as you say i guess that the two move orders are more or less equivalent, thanks.
Anthony, the petroff is sidestepped anyway regardless of the move order. I don't think that Nf3 is more forcing at all since as i said it gives white a sound extra option with 2...d6 which is probably much commoner than black deviations against 2.Nc3. So for now i an quite inclined to go with 2.Nc3. Thanks anyway for posting!
2/10/2016 - Gregoriev, 1925
by paulemanueljohnson a few minutes ago
Looking to practise Spanish Opening (Ruy Lopez)
by harselarse a few minutes ago
Renewal of Membership Farce
by steveinaustria 3 minutes ago
by newengland7 5 minutes ago
by SmyslovFan 5 minutes ago
by abinzynier 6 minutes ago
Which Dubrovnik Set do you like betterChessBazaar or House of Staunton?
by wiscmike 10 minutes ago
by alexm2310 10 minutes ago
Did I really fail at a tactics exercise because I did mate in 2 instead of in 1?
by SmyslovFan 12 minutes ago
stats v computer
by Martin_Stahl 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!