It's a bad opening. There is nothing more to say.
But he won with it when his opponent blundered his queen. That makes it a good opening right? Right?
It's a bad opening. There is nothing more to say.
You're thinking about the Yereslov opening...
The German opening is good IMO
It's not worthless. What if a grandmaster with an ELO of 2700+ plays it?
This is the most stupid thing I've ever seen. Black exposes his king and gives up TWO pawns for nothing in return (I'm talking about the mainline posted somewhere here)... And even if it was acceptable why wouldn't you play "normal" stuff like e5 or c5 in response. You can resign after playing f5.
It's not worthless. What if a grandmaster with an ELO of 2700+ plays it?
No 2700+ grandmaster plays this - and for good reasons.
It's not worthless. What if a grandmaster with an ELO of 2700+ plays it?
they lose...
please find a list of all grandmaster level games using this opening, lets compare the stats.
It's not worthless. What if a grandmaster with an ELO of 2700+ plays it?
they lose...
please find a list of all grandmaster level games using this opening, lets compare the stats.
Five bucks says his next comment is "No Grandmaster has ever lost with it! huehuehuehueh!"
Someone in the top 10 can play this and win against players rated 2600 and below, or at least draw by playing this.
Even at my level, I can easily convert a 2-pawn and positional advantage quite easily, even with perfect play from the opponent.
I see. Anyone else?
Good opening for black in blitz and bullet
Double that blitz rating, then we will be more willing to listen:)
So if I get 1410 then you will use my German opening?
So if I get 1410 then you will use my German opening?
1200 * 2 =/= 1400
almost half way there...
ok .....ahhhhh forget it.
?
It's a bad opening. There is nothing more to say.
But he won with it when his opponent blundered his queen. That makes it a good opening right? Right?