The Fried Liver Attack is OP

Sort:
Avatar of DerekDHarvey
darkbrah7654 wrote:

u could refute the fried liver by playing the english defense

or u could play the relatively unknown sideline of the english defense

What Fried Liver?

 

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

This is the Fried Liver Attack.

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

There is no other and calling any sac on f7 the Fried Liver is WRONG

Avatar of pfren
DerekDHarvey έγραψε:

There is no other and calling any sac on f7 the Fried Liver is WRONG

 

Too shallow. I am sure you can get better than that.

Avatar of 25GSchatz22

Usually, I play the Petrov Defense and end up in this position:

 

Avatar of asdfghkl123456798
25GSchatz22 wrote:

Usually, I play the Petrov Defense and end up in this position:

 

why don't you do 3...nxe4?

Avatar of 25GSchatz22

Yeah, I should just capture the pawn.

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

There is no other and calling any sac on f7 the Fried Liver is WRONG

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

@pfren you are SO deep

Avatar of JackRoach
DerekDHarvey wrote:

There is no other and calling any sac on f7 the Fried Liver is WRONG

Bruh. We're taking about three Traxler.

 

Or we were. Listen to the IM.

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

Sorry Jack, when I read the banner The Fried Liver Attack is OP I thought we were talking about the Fried Liver Attack. The Traxler is a horse of a different colour surely.

Avatar of pfren
DerekDHarvey έγραψε:

@pfren you are SO deep

 

Oh! If this is your best, then I'm sorry for spreading fake news in my previous post.

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

This is moment when some play Bxf2+ and go on to lose.

Avatar of DerekDHarvey

@pfren smartarse history

Avatar of JackRoach
DerekDHarvey wrote:

Sorry Jack, when I read the banner The Fried Liver Attack is OP I thought we were talking about the Fried Liver Attack. The Traxler is a horse of a different colour surely.

Oops, I meant the not three.

 

 

And, you know, threads can go off-topic. We were talking about the fried liver, then how to refute it, then someone claimed the Traxler defeats it, and then it turned into a productive argument.

Avatar of noImAparrot

what has happened 

Avatar of JackRoach
noImAparrot wrote:

what has happened 

I just explained it.

Avatar of assassin3752
JackRoach wrote:
noImAparrot wrote:

what has happened 

I just explained it.

lol

Avatar of noImAparrot

oops i didnt read it

Avatar of 25GSchatz22

The Traxler is related though...