The Petroff Defence. Your Thoughts.

Sort:
Chicken_Monster
pfren wrote:
DrSpudnik wrote:

Karpov wrote a book on it: Winning With the Petroff back in 1993.

Karpov wrote quite a few books, which he never wrote...

This one is probably written by Karpov himself, though.

There are several Petroff books out there- my personal preference is Sakaev's, which is not a heavyweight, and has the extra bonus that it's a complete system against 1.e4.

Thanks. Anything similar that is a complete system against 1.d4 etc.?

Sqod

In the '80s I owned a really good book on the Petroff I liked, which explained some of the ideas as well as the moves, in all the main variations. It was an older book with a soft brown cover, but I can't think of the name or author. It wasn't "The Petroff Defense" by Hagg and Forintos, though that one looks similar. I know my info is not of much help, except if somebody spots such a book online I can probably tell you if that's the one I had that I liked, and at least you know that at least one really good book on the Petroff is out there.

LouLit
lolurspammed wrote:

3..d6 is passive that's why it's not played as often, but you see it all the time by low rated club players

So my extremely low rating is why I enjoy playing Petroff's so much — I've always wondered.

I play this defense because I enjoy the living blazes out of it. From the first time I saw it in Modern Chess Openings in 1978, I had an affinty for it. I find it fun!

Is it drawish? Sure! Luckily, at my level, draws are rare as women who find me charming.

So I'm going to keep playing it and having fun — at least until I check out the Berlin thing.

Regards,

Lou