not as fun as the king's gambit.
The Queens Gambit
Sort:
trigs wrote:
not as fun as the king's gambit.
agreed
true, but sometimes more useful and less risk
walterp99 wrote:
What are your thoughts on the queens gambit, to sacrifice a queenside pawn, to have an advantage of the game in the longrun?
It isn't strictly a sacrifice. Black cannot hold on to the pawn for long anyway.
HGHG wrote:
walterp99 wrote:
What are your thoughts on the queens gambit, to sacrifice a queenside pawn, to have an advantage of the game in the longrun?
It isn't strictly a sacrifice. Black cannot hold on to the pawn for long anyway.
Yeah, it's not really a sacrifice since white can win the pawn back by force. I've won too many games to count where black tried to hold onto the pawn for wayyy too long, cracks me up everytime.
What are your thoughts on the queens gambit, to sacrifice a queenside pawn, to have an advantage of the game in the longrun?