The strongest opening ever is the Chuck Norris attack.
It's only weakness is against the Bruce Lee defense.
You are obviously not aware of the latest analyses by GrandPatzer Horatio da la Cucaracha, who proved, using the Stocklizard engine at 1-ply, that the Bruce Lee defence is a forced win for white.
I will post his analyses soon- say at April 1st.
Regards.
You made me lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet another attempt to garner more views.
I think a good name for this white setup is: The =+ Variation. Black develops, castles, plays d5 and has at the very least the slightly better position.
Even the Kopec Variation is better. Should be a good psychological weapon as weaker players will tend to underestimate the seemingly anti-positional Bd3 and therefore press too hard. Even if they don't it should be equal.
As far as I know, I do not realize that there is or was ever chess openings called the "Chuck Norris Attack" nor the "Bruce Lee Defense".
n00b
lol
The best opening against the Accelerated Dragon is the Maroczy Bind.
Uh. If that was the case, I would put my Taimanov to rest and get back to playing the Accelerated Dragon again. The most dangerous set-up for black is certainly the early Bc4-b3. Black faces a regular Dragon Yugoslav Attack, but has the extra option of Sc6xd4, b7-b5 followed by a7-a5, thanks to the fact that the white bishop is not longer eyeing the b5 square. Maroczy is a good positional choice and hard to beat, but black is extremely solid here.
Once more, another attempt at 3,000 views!!!
>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<
It really depends on your style of play.
Generally, there are two types of chess players:
1. Tactical players: Tactical players are stronger in open positions, good at calculating many variations (not in depth) and good at sacrificing pieces. However, positional understanding is their Achilles' heel,. They are weaker in strategy & long term plans.
2. Positional players: Positional players are stronger in closed positions, and strategy is their best skill. They are better at making long term plans, play more "quietly". Tactics is their weakness.
If you are a positional player (like me) then the strongest opening you should learn is called the King's Indian Defense.
If you are a tactical player, I recommend the Nimzovich Defense.
If you only do forums to get views then i will not post here at any point.....