pps1 wrote:
Hi people i am tired of people playing the ruy lopez which forces a draw look at krammnik vs admas 2005 sofia.But not because of that when i ask them why did you put Bb5 not bc4 they are speachless those how will answer will say ficher played it why.I askem why do you play the najdof why not the kan you can learn a strategicly more plus you dont win because of theory.they say ficher played .I want to hear youre thought on this topic
And yet the opening is still played at the highest levels.
Basically what you're saying is that you don't know why the bishop is played to b5. Other people do, so it's your problem.
no i know why they put it but i dont think its a good reason theoritcly speaaking f7 is the weaakest sqare why dont you attack that,scotch open d line openi black bishop centralized night my problem is they make art borring the ruy lopez is main prob read i have prob with other oppenings
Your analysis is very basic, the fact is that many decades of top level chess have shown that the Ruy Lopez is a better try for advantage than the Italian. Something as simple as 'it attacks f7' isn't really a convincing argument compared to that.
the reason that people think ruy lopez is better is
in the italian
the reason that they play like that they find Ng4 too risky but i think if you have nervs of steel you will win