Traxler Gambit

Sort:
Philipper

Hi, I would like to show a game I played in the Traxler Gambit. I think it's very sharp! What do you think of this opening? Is it perhaps even better than 4...d5? Please leave your thoughts.

Conquistador

You can find out everything you want to know about the Traxler Counterattack in the Traxler Analysis Group.  Join and Contribute!

http://www.chess.com/groups/home/traxler-analysis

Conquistador

The only problem with the Traxler Counterattack is that it is drawish in many lines if your opponent can make it through the complications.  4...d5 is much simpler and is a lot less drawish.  If you do study the Traxler enough, it can be a valuable weapon.

Conquistador

Personally, I get the feeling that black should be fine against 5.Bxf7+ and white should be better with 5.Nxf7.  The difference between the lines is that black has to prove compensation for a pawn rather than for a rook.  In general, black seems to have an easier game after 5.Bxf7+.

marvellosity
Conquiscador wrote:

Personally, I get the feeling that black should be fine against 5.Bxf7+ and white should be better with 5.Nxf7.  The difference between the lines is that black has to prove compensation for a pawn rather than for a rook.  In general, black seems to have an easier game after 5.Bxf7+.


I don't know how you can say that, every time you have a line I provide a response that leaves White considerably better.

I suppose I haven't looked for a while, I'll have to get back to refuting your claims of equality with various moves ;)

Conquistador

I knew it was only matter of time before I can get you back to work ;)

I think I have covered my bases this time.  Currently I am working on the 8.Nc3 variation to make it playable for black.  I had one line worked out, but I need to make sure I have all lines covered.

checkmateisnear

What if

Conquistador

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Nxf7 Bxf2+ 6.Kf1 Qe7 7.Nxh8 d5 8.exd5 Nd4 and black equalizes in all variations.

Shiraaaaazi

I love Traxler Gambit. I played this game. I don;t know what to do after this.

KillaBeez

Qh4 tends to lead to good positions for Black

Chessisbest

yea Qh4, not good enough to continue attack or regain piece. Better work on this particular variation, or avoid it.

westcoastchess

Ih8sens used to play it and study it all the time. I think he found a refution

Adios_Mark_Ay_Vivid

traxlerman:  I had that position recently which leads to mate in 4 in knight takes rook (which it did in my game) with queen f4 king e2 queen f2 king d3 knight c5 king c3 queen d4 checkmate.  The best move according to the engine though is g3, then knight captures on g3, pawn captures knight on g3 queen captures bishop on c4 knight captures on h8 and then queen c5.  I am going to stop there, but the king is clearly in a lot of danger.  Maybe move your d pawn forward to develop your bishop and then castle queenside.

Cubetacular

I remember facing this gambit when I was younger and losing very quickly, lol.

fridge41

Why didnt he play nb2 in move 17?

JackRoach

As a fried liver attack player, I get really annoyed by the Traxler system. But it was funny when this happened:

 

BOWTOTHETOAST

If you are in the traxler and your king on the f1 square and the queen goes to h4 never move your rook to g1. G1 allows checkmate with Qf2

 

BOWTOTHETOAST

Instead d2 when the bishop comes to c5 should do