Personally I feel that the sharper the game is, the higher the chance that an upset happens. I try to keep it simple against lower rated opponents, since they'll probably make a mistake somewhere, and make the game as messy as possible against better players.
Against 1.e4 e6, I think you need 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3, and if Black goes for 3...Bb4 then there are plenty of attacking lines. Against 3...Nf6 it's harder (I don't really know) and against 3...dxe4 you're out of luck, it's rather passive but very solid.
Against 1.e4 c6, there are many sharp lines within the Advance (1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5), e.g. after 3...Bf5 4.h4 (or 3...c5 4.c4!)
I know I've already asked this question for the Sicilian defence and I apologize
the reason I'm asking is because I've figured out that if you're playing against someone who's <100 rating points than you and you're risking to lose the triple of the points you would earn, maybe I'm mistaken, but it's better to go for a quick kill, because the longer the game last the higher is the probability to blunder
vs e5 it's not a problem there's ample choice between KG, Max Lange attacks, Fried Livers, Urusov gambits etc...
vs c5 they told me the best choice is just to play the open mainline Sicilian
but what about the other defences? e6 and c6 seem to be almost designed to blunt a sharp attack from White
vs d6 I've heard about the Austrian attack but what about Nf6, d5 and other minor defences against e4?
Thanks for your advices and I hope this thread to be useful to other readers too