Ok
What do you say about this gambit line?
Sort:
bearsoftheice님이 썼습니다:
If 7 nd4 then black by a couple landslides
Didn't see that.
Modified Version:
Aug 20, 2019
0
#5
How interesting 🙂 it does seem playable for black. I don't like White's 4. Nf3 though, as it loses white some tempo.
White has other options, like Nc4 as was already pointed out. I'm thinking white can even play a gambit herself with 4. Nxf7 Kxf7 5. Bc4+ followed by 6. Qh5. A knight for 2 pawns and Black's king trapped in the middle of the board seems exciting 😊
White has other options, like Nc4 as was already pointed out. I'm thinking white can even play a gambit herself with 4. Nxf7 Kxf7 5. Bc4+ followed by 6. Qh5. A knight for 2 pawns and Black's king trapped in the middle of the board seems exciting 😊
Aug 20, 2019
0
#6
ChessBoy513 wrote:
Since I made this, I would like to call it the Tenessee Gambit.
Would you be black or white?
The opening is the Kings Knight Opening. You did not make it.
ECO C40
IMBacon님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
Since I made this, I would like to call it the Tenessee Gambit.
Would you be black or white?
The opening is the Kings Knight Opening. You did not make it.
ECO C40
It's called King's Knight Opening because there's no name for it.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 is the King's Knight Opening.
Clavius님이 썼습니다:
An improvement for white on move 5.
Ok I never saw that. I'll try to improve for black.
Clavius님이 썼습니다:
Cooling mailbox has it right. Here is his idea with some comments.
...
Ok.......
I hate to say it, but you did not make this. This gambit has already been names the Busch-Gass Gambit. 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Bc5?!
*named
Aug 22, 2019
0
#14
More analysis on this interesting line that teaches a lot about opening principles.
According to Stockfish, it is nearly +2 for white in opening which is like 90% forced loss for black. Horrible, avoid!
LM_player님이 썼습니다:
I hate to say it, but you did not make this. This gambit has already been names the Busch-Gass Gambit. 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Bc5?!
What----------------------------
Dang it is there even any opening that's unamed?
Clavius님이 썼습니다:
More analysis on this interesting line that teaches a lot about opening principles.
ok I give up I just wanted to experiment with the line but now it seems terrible.
Since I made this, I would like to call it the Tenessee Gambit.
Would you be black or white?