What is the hardest opening for average players?

Sort:
Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?

you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.

then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer

Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
Badchesserrr4486999 написал:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?

you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.

then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer

Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?

Also ngl you probably dont know what the ruy lopez is and how to play it but i do soo i know more theory than you.

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier

Y’all we still on this game?

Puffer you lost. It’s fine. It’s one game. I took just as big of an L against you in that French back in the day just let it go. It rly doesn’t matter in the slightest.

Badrrr you’re lowkey somehow MORE of a sore winner than Puffer is a sore loser. You played nonsense, got lucky, and won a piece before Puffer resigned. Odds were you’d have had a hard time converting that winning endgame in blitz.

And again. It’s ONE GAME! If y’all wanna fight, take it outside and play a First to Ten match. Leave it out of the forums.

Avatar of AngryPuffer
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?

you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.

then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer

Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?

you still played most of the top moves

+ you have never played the Qxd4 line ever and you typically play the open. suddenly you know how to play it and how it works? yeah no.

Avatar of illegalthingy
So that is just winawer theory and how does Sicilian theory have to do with anything and he’s a 1300 he can find it using positional theory so he’s probably not cheating
Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?

you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.

then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer

Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?

you still played most of the top moves

+ you have never played the Qxd4 line ever and you typically play the open. suddenly you know how to play it and how it works? yeah no.

..........................
I picked it up after i witnessed hikaru playing it. though i didnt get to the lines i saw hikaru play soo i just played like i did in the game.

Avatar of Leothemaster3

f4 to confuse your opponent

Avatar of AngryPuffer

you followed the lichess database untill it ran out of master games

Avatar of illegalthingy
I must tell this to everyone in history class but being a substitute teacher or a history teacher sounds boring
Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
AngryPuffer написал:

you followed the lichess database untill it ran out of master games

Wow soo are you telling me i cant play well on my own?

Avatar of AngryPuffer
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:

you followed the lichess database untill it ran out of master games

Wow soo are you telling me i cant play well on my own?

yes

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:

you followed the lichess database untill it ran out of master games

Wow soo are you telling me i cant play well on my own?

yes

............................................................................................................................

Avatar of AngryPuffer

ive said this before, i will say it agian

you play completely different agianst the 1200-1300 people you play typically. you go out on all out dubious attacks, dont know much opening theory, and play at average 75-85% accuracy

then suddenly agianst me you know everything there is to the opening and your playing at 95%+ accuracy????

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
AngryPuffer написал:

ive said this before, i will say it agian

you play completely different agianst the 1200-1300 people you play typically. you go out on all out dubious attacks, dont know much opening theory, and play at average 75-85% accuracy

then suddenly agianst me you know everything there is to the opening and your playing at 95%+ accuracy????

Yeah.

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999

But maybe not know everything to the opening.

Avatar of illegalthingy
I am a 100% opening player and the wing gambit makes sense to play weird people probably play it when there 3
Avatar of MarioParty4
illegalthingy wrote:
I am a 100% opening player and the wing gambit makes sense to play weird people probably play it when there 3

300's don't play Silican Defense, I know this because I used to be a 300.

Avatar of illegalthingy
I’m talking about a 3 year old seeing the Sicilian and playing the wing gambit
Avatar of illegalthingy
What
Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
alexlehrersh написал:

ok for babys

you would lose if some 1000ish would play the wing gambit against you

I feel like you are just trash talking and underestimating the theoretical madness these 1400s can pull out.