I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
What is the worst gambit?

check the analysis game review, it’s flat-out a brilliant move

Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.

Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
The description of a brilliant move is "The best move -- and hard to find"

I think the worst gambit is the Anti Reti Gambit:
no its the kings gambit
When the name you use does not describe the moves you offer, the name is the B.E.* Gambit. Certainly the worst, as it only seeks attention.
.
…
.
.
*Bovine excrement

I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.

I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.
bro this is the damiano gambit

I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.
bro this is the damiano gambit
I said nothing to the contrary. What I did say is that people get the name and history wrong. Please see http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2013/06/damianos-gambit.html

Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
By that logic, almost every gambit ever is brilliant. The Damiano Gambit doesn't even win material, since after Qe7, there is no way to defend the e4 pawn that also doesn't lose the knight. You just end up with a centralized knight at the cost of a center pawn, with the only advantage white has is the extra tempo (which if Qxe4+ you waste your gained tempo blocking) and the potential for a kingside attack due to black’s own poor move. It's probably only a brilliant on extremely low depth

Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
By that logic, almost every gambit ever is brilliant. The Damiano Gambit doesn't even win material, since after Qe7, there is no way to defend the e4 pawn that also doesn't lose the knight. You just end up with a centralized knight at the cost of a center pawn, with the only advantage white has is the extra tempo (which if Qxe4+ you waste your gained tempo blocking) and the potential for a kingside attack due to black’s own poor move. It's probably only a brilliant on extremely low depth
after qe7, nf3 bro
plus depth 43 says +2.3
Why do you think