I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
What is the worst gambit?
Sort:
It gives up a rook.
P.S. Nxe5 is a brilliant move.
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
fremble wrote:
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
check the analysis game review, it’s flat-out a brilliant move
fremble wrote:
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
Jul 14, 2023
0
#247
Ak11109 wrote:
fremble wrote:
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
The description of a brilliant move is "The best move -- and hard to find"
wongroldan wrote:
I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
i think the worst one is coca cola gambit
Jul 15, 2023
0
#250
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
OctopusSqueeze2007 wrote:
I think the worst gambit is the Anti Reti Gambit:
no its the kings gambit
When the name you use does not describe the moves you offer, the name is the B.E.* Gambit. Certainly the worst, as it only seeks attention.
.
…
.
.
*Bovine excrement
Jul 15, 2023
0
#251
AhmedAryan wrote:
wongroldan wrote:
I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.
Ziryab wrote:
AhmedAryan wrote:
wongroldan wrote:
I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.
bro this is the damiano gambit
+2.2 goddamit
Jul 16, 2023
0
#253
AhmedAryan wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
AhmedAryan wrote:
wongroldan wrote:
I think it's the damiano defense, damiano gambit
damiano gambit is +2.2 bruh
Damiano’s gambit was a knight sacrifice, not the stupid f-pawn advance. No one knows history.
bro this is the damiano gambit
+2.2 goddamit
I said nothing to the contrary. What I did say is that people get the name and history wrong. Please see http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2013/06/damianos-gambit.html
Ak11109 wrote:
fremble wrote:
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
By that logic, almost every gambit ever is brilliant. The Damiano Gambit doesn't even win material, since after Qe7, there is no way to defend the e4 pawn that also doesn't lose the knight. You just end up with a centralized knight at the cost of a center pawn, with the only advantage white has is the extra tempo (which if Qxe4+ you waste your gained tempo blocking) and the potential for a kingside attack due to black’s own poor move. It's probably only a brilliant on extremely low depth
fremble wrote:
Ak11109 wrote:
fremble wrote:
Nxe5 isn’t a brilliant move. It isn’t even the best move in the position
Brilliant moves dont have to be the top engine move. A brilliancy is a great move involving a clever sacrifice of a piece to gain or maintain advantage. Not always the best move.
By that logic, almost every gambit ever is brilliant. The Damiano Gambit doesn't even win material, since after Qe7, there is no way to defend the e4 pawn that also doesn't lose the knight. You just end up with a centralized knight at the cost of a center pawn, with the only advantage white has is the extra tempo (which if Qxe4+ you waste your gained tempo blocking) and the potential for a kingside attack due to black’s own poor move. It's probably only a brilliant on extremely low depth
after qe7, nf3 bro
plus depth 43 says +2.3
my country has the worst gambit lol
Queens qambit
Why do you think