What opening are you least prepared for (you can take either side)?

Sort:
Avatar of checkmateibeatu

The title is self-explanatory.

Avatar of zman1234

I'd have to say sicilian. i'm usually unprepared for sicilian as white and black! :D

Avatar of GrandmasterAdam

french for white i will never play it for black and have no clue how to play against it just out of lazyiness, but have been doing well with advanced varation

Avatar of boamind

Any body prepared for this?

Avatar of ozzie_c_cobblepot
English, Catalan.
Avatar of boamind
ajedrecito wrote:

Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1


True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5

Avatar of DonnieDarko1980

As black, I'm unprepared against 1. c4 and 1. Nf3 (and of course any other off-beat first move). Against 1. c4 I play e5, against 1. Nf3 d5, my alternative repertoire is "e6 against everything", but I don't know any lines from that point on.

As white I'm most unprepared against the Pirc/Modern, again, I just make natural developing moves here but don't know any lines.

Avatar of Eatityounastyasshack
boamind wrote:
ajedrecito wrote:

Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1


True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5


Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?

Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...

Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.

Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)

Avatar of raider53

1. c4; I haven't studied a line against it.

Avatar of boamind
vulpesVelox wrote:
boamind wrote:
ajedrecito wrote:

Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1


True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5


Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?

Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...

Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.

Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)


It is just for fun, even i play chess just for fun, why should i take the fun part away from fun. no theory behind it just fun.

Avatar of checkmateibeatu
Or maybe sacrifice your bishop? You can not rely on the shock factor to win a chess game. I have seen that in many of your games, you equalized the material in the end, meaning that your opponent most likely missed some basic tactics.
Avatar of Eatityounastyasshack
boamind wrote:
vulpesVelox wrote:
boamind wrote:
ajedrecito wrote:

Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1


True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5


Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?

Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...

Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.

Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)


It is just for fun, even i play chess just for fun, why should i take the fun part away from fun. no theory behind it just fun.


And that's kinda cool, monsieur!

To answer your question; I'm neither schocked nor in awe. I'd just grab it and prepare myself for the ensuing attack (actually quite like playing the white side of 1. f3 xx, 2. Kf2 etc.) :)

 

Edit:
As far as openings I'm able to turn into greek salad within four moves; let's just say they're abundant and my fear is steady and dominant regardless (vulpes, shaking like a leaf) :)

Avatar of BobbyRaulMorphy

1.d4 like ajedrecito.  It's nowhere near as common as e4 at club level.  I always end up playing some hopeful nimzo/qid thing.

Avatar of boamind

Bongcloud queen sacrifice opening
Avatar of checkmateibeatu
Are you a Bongcloud lover in disguise?