I'd have to say sicilian. i'm usually unprepared for sicilian as white and black! :D
What opening are you least prepared for (you can take either side)?
french for white i will never play it for black and have no clue how to play against it just out of lazyiness, but have been doing well with advanced varation
Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1
True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues
As black, I'm unprepared against 1. c4 and 1. Nf3 (and of course any other off-beat first move). Against 1. c4 I play e5, against 1. Nf3 d5, my alternative repertoire is "e6 against everything", but I don't know any lines from that point on.
As white I'm most unprepared against the Pirc/Modern, again, I just make natural developing moves here but don't know any lines.
Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1
True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5
Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?
Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...
Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.
Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)
Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1
True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5
Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?
Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...
Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.
Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)
It is just for fun, even i play chess just for fun, why should i take the fun part away from fun. no theory behind it just fun.
Yeah, I think the latest theory gives 3...Kxf7!!, White resigns 0-1
True against GMs white resigns but at club level story continues
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-very-detailed-queen-sacrifice-opening-analysis?page=5
Since I read your thread the first time, I've been wondering; did you ever concider sacrificing the king instead?
Most of the games in the thread in question relies on your opponent(s) missing discovered attacks here and there and/or missing - say - your hanging pieces...
Hardly substantial evidence that sacrificing your one developed piece while giving your opponent development is a good idea.
Oh well, just curious. It DOES look like you're having fun :)
It is just for fun, even i play chess just for fun, why should i take the fun part away from fun. no theory behind it just fun.
And that's kinda cool, monsieur!
To answer your question; I'm neither schocked nor in awe. I'd just grab it and prepare myself for the ensuing attack (actually quite like playing the white side of 1. f3 xx, 2. Kf2 etc.) :)
Edit:
As far as openings I'm able to turn into greek salad within four moves; let's just say they're abundant and my fear is steady and dominant regardless (vulpes, shaking like a leaf) :)
The title is self-explanatory.