Hi
Thank you for adding to the conversation.
I d4 because it has a lower % of draws?
I never get draws on e4 most is when I blay d4
I d4 because it has a lower % of draws?
I never get draws on e4 most is when I blay d4
To blay!
As an e4 player I dislike the positions arising from 1d4 from the white side. If only 1d4 existed and hypothetically you were not allowed to play 1e4 I would not be playing chess at all. Having said that 1d4 is definitely the better move as white has a risk free game with only one exception - when facing the Dutch defence.
Honestly, it's really just whatever brings the most openings you like. Bobby may have said "With 1.e4! I win," but they're the same for all practical matters but one- e4 is sharp, d4 is quiet, generally.
Both e4 and d4 are bad; the only winning move is not to play
The same happens in love or friendship
everything runs on opportunistic interests.
There is nothing pure in this world , not even in chess, so the best thing is not to play.
I can proudly say that I have never lost a single game against Magnus Carlsen.
I have stood by his side and shaken his hand, but I would never think of playing a game against the Norwegian because I already know the result in the long run
Both e4 and d4 are bad; the only winning move is not to play
The same happens in love or friendship
everything runs on opportunistic interests.
There is nothing pure in this world , not even in chess, so the best thing is not to play.
I can proudly say that I have never lost a single game against Magnus Carlsen.
I have stood by his side and shaken his hand, but I would never think of playing a game against the Norwegian because I already know the result in the long run
This is a Chess discussion over the internet, not a philosophical inquiry over tea.
Hi