Which sicilian defense do you play and why?

Sort:
Mumasson

Do you have a favorite? Why do you prefer it over the other variations?

ConfusedGhoul

I like the Classical because Black is going to transpose to a Dragon in the blink of an eye if White messes up or is going to be better in case of the natural 6 Be3 with 6... Ng4! But I am studying the Najdorf right now as a surprise weapon against opponents that know me

Solmyr1234

Kan - confusing for opponent's pieces - he can't attack easily like he wants to - pawns are in the way, easy and trivial development for you, many tricks you can do with your queen. king is safe with or without 0-0.

ConfusedGhoul

I agree, I find it hard to attack the Kan and my pieces feel a bit stupid

RAU4ever

Dragon. It's got the name, it's got the ferocity, and I love my bishop too much to put it on e7.

Ujan_000

..

ThrillerFan

None of them because the Sicilian is a cardinal sin!  I play 1...e6!! like a religious cult!

Colonizor48

The caro kann.

beesmastajoe
I play the hyper accelerated dragon because it is aggressive and the bishop can be powerful when fianchettoed.
blueemu

The Najdorf, because it avoids the positional weakness of the Dragon, Shveshnikov or Kalashnikov while still being extremely double-edged.

ConfusedGhoul

the Bishop is nothing other than a tall pawn in the Hyper A Dragon against the best move 3. c3! Playing an Alapin where the Bishop on g7 is bad

MTXChessOfficial

I love playing the hyperaccelerated dragon. I've found this variation to be very sharp and I feel like I come out of the opening equal or even better as black, even when playing 1900+ rated opponents.

Check out my explanation of this opening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRGIUqU_2UE&t=41s&ab_channel=MTXChess

busterlark

The Najdorf, but mostly because I had a book on it as a kid, so it happens to be the one I'm most familiar with

sndeww
Mumasson wrote:

Do you have a favorite? Why do you prefer it over the other variations?

Nimzowitsch sicilian because it's funky and has minimal theory as well as being completely sound

Jenium
ConfusedGhoul wrote:

I agree, I find it hard to attack the Kan and my pieces feel a bit stupid

Yep. Is there an easy to play setup against the Kan?

ThrillerFan

I get opponents that try to play the Kan moves even when I play an anti-sicilian!  They are clueless and playing Kan moves like a robot and not considering the MAJOR differences between the Open and Closed Sicilians.

StevieG65
The Modern Scheveningen, because I like playing with a fluid centre.
StumpyBlitzer

Najdorf i prefer, it's solid

I used to like the dragon but hated the yugoslav attack where the pawns g and h were flying up the board.