e4 is better. d4 is easier. The d-pawn is well defended by the queen, whereas the e-pawn is sent out all alone, doing the work of a martyr. It's a no brainer as to which one is easier.
Why, 1.e4 could be considered a gambit opening.
e4 fails to the french. don't believe me, challenge as white and play e4. then send another challenge as black. i'll play d4
I play the French myself all the time. It's not a refutation to 1.e4 in the slightest, otherwise no one would be playing 1.e4 at all. In an age full of computer analyses, why are we STILL playing 1.e4? It's obviously not refuted, dubious, or even as questionable as you make it out to be.
d4 is protected, while e4 opens diagnals on the first turn. Pick whichever you like best. They both have to deal with nasty defenses.

e4 is better. d4 is easier. The d-pawn is well defended by the queen, whereas the e-pawn is sent out all alone, doing the work of a martyr. It's a no brainer as to which one is easier.
Why, 1.e4 could be considered a gambit opening.
e4 fails to the french. don't believe me, challenge as white and play e4. then send another challenge as black. i'll play d4