Alexandra botez is dating GM Eric hanson

Sort:
darthenstein

I hope they are dating, because they have such beautiful chemistry together!  Whether they are or not, they must be careful as the internet is their workplace...dating in the workplace is a very cautious thing;  let alone, when the whole world is watching them!!!

NikolaiSpongnikov
His best bet is to go for the other sister, Andrea. At least then he’ll have a chance with getting with Alexandra through the jealousy factor. It’ll probably go south though. Unfortunately there aren’t more Botez’s so it can’t be a Nash problem XD
Chessflyfisher
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Chessflyfisher wrote:

 

She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.

 

But.. why?

 

Which of my observations are you questioning? Most would agree that she is better than average in looks. Any man would be very fortunate to be dating her regardless of their looks/personalities. Remember, men are still for the most part the aggressors even in this day and age and therefore women have the "right to refusal" even if you feel that you are "co equals" in looks and personalities. You might even think that you are superior in both respects to the "targeted" woman. Lastly, even though this section of chess.com is mostly visited by adults, it would be inappropriate to indulge in "locker room talk" and I value my membership so much, I do not wish to risk even getting warnings for improper speech.  

Muisuitglijder

When she's hot

And when she's not





 

Returnofcookiemonster
Spelenderwijs wrote:

When she's hot

And when she's not

 





 

 

 

Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.

 

Any man would be willing to date her. 

Returnofcookiemonster
Chessflyfisher wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Chessflyfisher wrote:

 

She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.

 

But.. why?

 

Which of my observations are you questioning? Most would agree that she is better than average in looks. Any man would be very fortunate to be dating her regardless of their looks/personalities. Remember, men are still for the most part the aggressors even in this day and age and therefore women have the "right to refusal" even if you feel that you are "co equals" in looks and personalities. You might even think that you are superior in both respects to the "targeted" woman. Lastly, even though this section of chess.com is mostly visited by adults, it would be inappropriate to indulge in "locker room talk" and I value my membership so much, I do not wish to risk even getting warnings for improper speech.  

 

 

Exactly women hold the power. 

 

 

Returnofcookiemonster
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
His best bet is to go for the other sister, Andrea. At least then he’ll have a chance with getting with Alexandra through the jealousy factor. It’ll probably go south though. Unfortunately there aren’t more Botez’s so it can’t be a Nash problem XD

 

 

No way, her sister is far more attractive.

 

Probably holds higher standards

Confused-psyduck
returnofcookiemoster wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:

When she's hot

And when she's not

 





 

 

 

Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.

 

Any man would be willing to date her. 

Don't pretend your desires are the same as other's. You'd love to, some people Just would not..

NikolaiSpongnikov
I’m detecting an r/niceguy with an addiction to simping.....
brianchesscake

Alexandra is 24 and Andrea is 17, so Eric would be more likely to date Alex because they're closer in age.

On a side note, Alex looks a lot like young Sandra Bullock and Eric looks like young Keanu Reeves happy.png

MorphysMayhem

I would have to admit to having a hard time concentrating.......on the chess game is what I meant.......

Returnofcookiemonster
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
I’m detecting an r/niceguy with an addiction to simping.....

 

 

Not even close buddy, just because im stating the obvious does not neccessarily mean im having some nice guy persona?

Returnofcookiemonster
Confused-psyduck wrote:
returnofcookiemoster wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:

When she's hot

And when she's not

 





 

 

 

Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.

 

Any man would be willing to date her. 

Don't pretend your desires are the same as other's. You'd love to, some people Just would not..

 

 

Sorry im not a beta or a simp.

 

Just because some person is attractive doesnt automatically assume i should swoon over them.

Why?

Returnofcookiemonster
brianchesscake wrote:

Alexandra is 24 and Andrea is 17, so Eric would be more likely to date Alex because they're closer in age.

On a side note, Alex looks a lot like young Sandra Bullock and Eric looks like young Keanu Reeves

 

Age of consent in oregon is 18

NikolaiSpongnikov
Isn’t it 14 in Iceland?
Returnofcookiemonster
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
Isn’t it 14 in Iceland?

 

 

why are you going to go for some 14 year olds in iceland?

NikolaiSpongnikov
Why are you going to go for some 18 year old Oregonians?
Tja_05

Chessflyfisher wrote:

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Chessflyfisher wrote:

 

She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.

 

But.. why?

 

Which of my observations are you questioning? Most would agree that she is better than average in looks. Any man would be very fortunate to be dating her regardless of their looks/personalities. Remember, men are still for the most part the aggressors even in this day and age and therefore women have the "right to refusal" even if you feel that you are "co equals" in looks and personalities. You might even think that you are superior in both respects to the "targeted" woman. Lastly, even though this section of chess.com is mostly visited by adults, it would be inappropriate to indulge in "locker room talk" and I value my membership so much, I do not wish to risk even getting warnings for improper speech.  

I am questioning the urge to be graphic. More specifically, the final part of your original statement.

Returnofcookiemonster
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
Why are you going to go for some 18 year old Oregonians?

What for if 18 year olds standards are set higher if they can get famous guys like eric handsome.

 

@1:39

 

NikolaiSpongnikov
That doesn’t make sense....
This forum topic has been locked