Chessflyfisher wrote:
But.. why?
She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.
Alexandra botez is dating GM Eric hanson
Sort:
returnofcookiemoster wrote:
Desirability being the key word here.
Justs99171 wrote:
returnofcookiemonster … that is fantastic. I almost had an asthma attack laughing.
Looks are everything you are delusional if you don't think so.
I have no issue with alexandra botez.
But in all seriousness, to get on the level of her, you need to be within her desirability.
Apr 15, 2020
0
#24
Chessflyfisher wrote:
She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.
He has status
Magical things can happen when you are popular and famous
Apr 15, 2020
0
#25
I hope they are dating, because they have such beautiful chemistry together! Whether they are or not, they must be careful as the internet is their workplace...dating in the workplace is a very cautious thing; let alone, when the whole world is watching them!!!
His best bet is to go for the other sister, Andrea. At least then he’ll have a chance with getting with Alexandra through the jealousy factor. It’ll probably go south though. Unfortunately there aren’t more Botez’s so it can’t be a Nash problem XD
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
Chessflyfisher wrote:
But.. why?
She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.
Which of my observations are you questioning? Most would agree that she is better than average in looks. Any man would be very fortunate to be dating her regardless of their looks/personalities. Remember, men are still for the most part the aggressors even in this day and age and therefore women have the "right to refusal" even if you feel that you are "co equals" in looks and personalities. You might even think that you are superior in both respects to the "targeted" woman. Lastly, even though this section of chess.com is mostly visited by adults, it would be inappropriate to indulge in "locker room talk" and I value my membership so much, I do not wish to risk even getting warnings for improper speech.
And when she's not
Apr 15, 2020
0
#29
Spelenderwijs wrote:
When she's hot
And when she's not
Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.
Any man would be willing to date her.
Apr 15, 2020
0
#30
Chessflyfisher wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
Chessflyfisher wrote:
But.. why?
She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.
Which of my observations are you questioning? Most would agree that she is better than average in looks. Any man would be very fortunate to be dating her regardless of their looks/personalities. Remember, men are still for the most part the aggressors even in this day and age and therefore women have the "right to refusal" even if you feel that you are "co equals" in looks and personalities. You might even think that you are superior in both respects to the "targeted" woman. Lastly, even though this section of chess.com is mostly visited by adults, it would be inappropriate to indulge in "locker room talk" and I value my membership so much, I do not wish to risk even getting warnings for improper speech.
Exactly women hold the power.
Apr 15, 2020
0
#31
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
His best bet is to go for the other sister, Andrea. At least then he’ll have a chance with getting with Alexandra through the jealousy factor. It’ll probably go south though. Unfortunately there aren’t more Botez’s so it can’t be a Nash problem XD
No way, her sister is far more attractive.
Probably holds higher standards
returnofcookiemoster wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:
When she's hot
And when she's not
Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.
Any man would be willing to date her.
Don't pretend your desires are the same as other's. You'd love to, some people Just would not..
I’m detecting an r/niceguy with an addiction to simping.....
I wouldn't kick either of them out of bed for eating crackers.
Alexandra is 24 and Andrea is 17, so Eric would be more likely to date Alex because they're closer in age.
On a side note, Alex looks a lot like young Sandra Bullock and Eric looks like young Keanu Reeves 
Apr 15, 2020
0
#36
I would have to admit to having a hard time concentrating.......on the chess game is what I meant.......
Apr 16, 2020
0
#37
NikolaiSpongnikov wrote:
I’m detecting an r/niceguy with an addiction to simping.....
Not even close buddy, just because im stating the obvious does not neccessarily mean im having some nice guy persona?
Apr 16, 2020
0
#38
Confused-psyduck wrote:
returnofcookiemoster wrote:
Spelenderwijs wrote:
When she's hot
And when she's not
Stop cherry picking for a female her smv and worth is higher than magnus carlsens winnings.
Any man would be willing to date her.
Don't pretend your desires are the same as other's. You'd love to, some people Just would not..
Sorry im not a beta or a simp.
Just because some person is attractive doesnt automatically assume i should swoon over them.
Why?
Apr 16, 2020
0
#39
brianchesscake wrote:
Alexandra is 24 and Andrea is 17, so Eric would be more likely to date Alex because they're closer in age.
On a side note, Alex looks a lot like young Sandra Bullock and Eric looks like young Keanu Reeves
Age of consent in oregon is 18
She is quite attractive and he is lucky if he is dating her. I want to get very graphic but I do not wish to be censored.