2300s know pretty much nothing compare to 2700s, as 1900s know pretty much nothing compare to 2300s, etc.
The only difference is : 2700s know they pretty much know nothing, and that's why they're the strongest.
So I think that unless Magnus lost to an Unrated, that would be the only way to win as a 2300 against a 2700.
There is not much difference between 2300 and 2700. I believe conventional wisdom says it's just a few thousand hours of practice. It's just probably about 2 years worth of study.
I mean, 2300s know pretty much everything and 2700s know pretty much everything right? So it's probably about equal.
This is also the reason anyone can be a GM. All you have to do is spend a few years learning pretty much everything like those players did. After you more or less know everything about chess it's simple.
Yeah, probably 33% chance of win, 33% chance of draw and 33% chance of loss.
You're really ignorant. If that were the case everybody in the 2000-2699 would be 2700 given a few years. That logic is a joke. It's not just about the work ethic - talent needs to be factored in there.
In chess?
I'm pretty sure Wafflemaster was trolling...
I think it is entirely possible for a 2700 to occaisionally blunder in a way that a 2300 could take advantage of and win, but I doubt it would happen frequently at all, and it would have to be more the 2700 "losing" the game than the 2300 "winning".
There is not much difference between 2300 and 2700. I believe conventional wisdom says it's just a few thousand hours of practice. It's just probably about 2 years worth of study.
I mean, 2300s know pretty much everything and 2700s know pretty much everything right? So it's probably about equal.
This is also the reason anyone can be a GM. All you have to do is spend a few years learning pretty much everything like those players did. After you more or less know everything about chess it's simple.
Yeah, probably 33% chance of win, 33% chance of draw and 33% chance of loss.
You're really ignorant. If that were the case everybody in the 2000-2699 would be 2700 given a few years. That logic is a joke. It's not just about the work ethic - talent needs to be factored in there.
there are a lot of 1200 players out there who think in a few years with hard work they can become a GM. all you need is determination. This is garbage that is the only way to become a GM(with a coach). but it is very rare to not have a lot of talent and become a GM
There is not much difference between 2300 and 2700. I believe conventional wisdom says it's just a few thousand hours of practice. It's just probably about 2 years worth of study.
I mean, 2300s know pretty much everything and 2700s know pretty much everything right? So it's probably about equal.
This is also the reason anyone can be a GM. All you have to do is spend a few years learning pretty much everything like those players did. After you more or less know everything about chess it's simple.
Yeah, probably 33% chance of win, 33% chance of draw and 33% chance of loss.
You're really ignorant. If that were the case everybody in the 2000-2699 would be 2700 given a few years. That logic is a joke. It's not just about the work ethic - talent needs to be factored in there.
there are a lot of 1200 players out there who think in a few years with hard work they can become a GM. all you need is determination. This is garbage that is the only way to become a GM(with a coach). but it is very rare to not have a lot of talent and become a GM
chess is more or less the same as a martial art. it takes years to become a black belt or master in any martial art. it takes years to become an IM or GM. same principles apply. people who think this is not the case are deluding themselves.
There is not much difference between 2300 and 2700. I believe conventional wisdom says it's just a few thousand hours of practice. It's just probably about 2 years worth of study.
I mean, 2300s know pretty much everything and 2700s know pretty much everything right? So it's probably about equal.
This is also the reason anyone can be a GM. All you have to do is spend a few years learning pretty much everything like those players did. After you more or less know everything about chess it's simple.
Yeah, probably 33% chance of win, 33% chance of draw and 33% chance of loss.
What? 2700+ is the elite, dude. There's like only 50 players who are 2700+ and they are super strong. 2300 is piece of cake for them. 2300s indeed know a lot. A 2300 might be the same strength as a 2700 in tactics, but the positional understanding of a super GM is just much higher.
harryz wrote:
I dont think so. 400 points is a big difference.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1674951 what is this. A 2300player who drew with a 2700 player.
wafflemaster you were joking right?