Sooooooo.......you're christians? Modern christians?
Crusader Recruits
Sort:
Jun 4, 2011
0
#3
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Jun 4, 2011
0
#4
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
Jun 4, 2011
0
#5
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
Glad I could help! As with almost everything I write, I don't actually believe a word of it, though 
trysts wrote:
Sooooooo.......you're christians? Modern christians?
Is this dogma? Seriously, we're so ignorant of history in this country that I wonder if more than 30% know that Crusaders were Christians.
Jun 4, 2011
0
#7
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
Sooooooo.......you're christians? Modern christians?
Is this dogma? Seriously, we're so ignorant of history in this country that I wonder if more than 30% know that Crusaders were Christians.
True, though the word has become widely used in a non-religious sense, so it's not necessarily that surprising.
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
I don't think you need to fear crusading online chess players.
Jun 4, 2011
0
#9
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
I don't think you need to fear crusading online chess players.
That didn't help, EP. But thanks anyway
It's time to take back the world for the right guys! Let's go!
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
I don't think you need to fear crusading online chess players.
We are not crusading online.
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
I don't think you need to fear crusading online chess players.
We are not crusading online.
Crusaders were loyal to their causes. So if you join the group, be loyal and help it.
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
Sooooooo.......you're christians? Modern christians?
Is this dogma? Seriously, we're so ignorant of history in this country that I wonder if more than 30% know that Crusaders were Christians.
@electric - Thought i'd add my 1 cent to this topic ..what make people christians? Because they strive to follow Christ, in their lives, sooooo IF the Crusaders were really christians they would have put their swords down and NOT invade countries to kill and stop the ******* movement from invading. I think they should have just switched their names to something else..sort of Like Alexander the Great when he conquered regions. If Jesus wanted to take the sword and be violent, he would have allowed Simon Peter to cut off both ears of the sneaky servant who was with the guards, when Jesus was betrayed by Judas. Also, he would have stirred his followers to fight for his life. That just wasn't what it was about.
The Crusaders were looking for a jihad. As ill-conceived as modern Islamic terrorists. Religious zealots are always dangerous. Deja vu.
1pawndown wrote:
The Crusaders were looking for a jihad. As ill-conceived as modern Islamic terrorists. Religious zealots are always dangerous. Deja vu.
Best go back to your history books..try some of the older history books that haven't been busy rewriting history and leaving out important facts.
Optimum225 wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
Sooooooo.......you're christians? Modern christians?
Is this dogma? Seriously, we're so ignorant of history in this country that I wonder if more than 30% know that Crusaders were Christians.
@electric - Thought i'd add my 1 cent to this topic ..what make people christians? Because they strive to follow Christ, in their lives, sooooo IF the Crusaders were really christians they would have put their swords down and NOT invade countries to kill and stop the ******* movement from invading. I think they should have just switched their names to something else..sort of Like Alexander the Great when he conquered regions. If Jesus wanted to take the sword and be violent, he would have allowed Simon Peter to cut off both ears of the sneaky servant who was with the guards, when Jesus was betrayed by Judas. Also, he would have stirred his followers to fight for his life. That just wasn't what it was about.
Are
you
high
?
Agent-Carlos-1470 wrote:
electricpawn wrote:
trysts wrote:
NickYoung5 wrote:
They could be crusaders (in the general, non-religious sense) for the Modern defence, trysts!
Oh yes, you're right! I don't have to be scared any longer! Thanks, NY5!
I don't think you need to fear crusading online chess players.
We are not crusading online.
Then you aren't crusaders?
[COMMENT DELETED]