There is no other way to put it fairly, other than Fischer was allowed and encouraged to vent himself on his favorite topics, as he did, repeatedly, and so it was known what to expect from him and still he was invited on.
There were several interviews, not just one, and I have them all.
I don't say that the Filipinos "liked the things he said," just that they weren't bothered by his rants enough to do other than facilitate his saying them on the air.
Now, had Fischer been saying Filipino instead of Jew, or Philipines instead of USA, I suspect he would not have been enjoying such free speech for so long. That's the difference between not caring and caring.

goldendog: I can't recall any negative comments about Fischer from Filipino chess fans. Note that I said that the Filipinos liked HIM despite what he said--you invented that I said that they liked WHAT HE SAID.
To say that we liked HIM 'despite' what he said - this is the juncture of our misunderstanding because you now replied with : they allowed and encouraged everything - now contrary to the 'despite' it seems that it becomes 'inspite'. It implies that since we liked fischer we also liked the things he said by 'encouraging him'.
To 'encourage' doesn't fit the whole scenario. Bobby is free to say whatever he wanted on that radio station, in that interview the DJ had calm down fischer because RJF was really raving. I heard the whole interview, I was following the events on TV and radio.
And the equation is not my creation, it's a simple clarification giving you opportunity to express yourself further so we can attain level ground because I may not be as intelligent as you.