Or maybe, pick a topic that is more than just a yes-no question that can be answered by a quick google search.
I Googled "Is the second amendment intended to allow for chess pieces with AK-47s in a shooting competition at the Olympic Games," and it wasn't very helpful.
I made the effort to read the whole first comment, but then skipped the second...how could I miss this gem?
If this thread had been titled "Is Macer75 no longer a top 2 troll," it would have blown up within minutes
I think you now have a moral obligation to write that thread, or you risk disappointing the whole chess.community.
I certainly appreciate that you enjoyed the remark. I might create that thread sometime in the future, now that there's demand for it but in the meantime I have... shall we say a few other ideas I'd like to try out.
... and people wonder why I don't create serious chess-related threads. If this thread had been titled "Is Macer75 no longer a top 2 troll," it would have blown up within minutes.
Well, it took a day, but it did blow up.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/is-macer75-no-longer-a-top-2-troll
It should be a great match! I hope it isn't decided by those random 960 games. They really detract from the event. Carlsen lost a 960 game to Grischuk because he forgot about the castling rule in 960. It's a bad joke to have those games as part of a blitz/bullet match.
Or maybe, pick a topic that is more than just a yes-no question that can be answered by a quick google search.