No need to, I was in a match where it looked hopeless to me, but then I made it turn into a stalemate.
People who DO NOT RESIGN in a lost position.
Sort:
I think that's because you are playing with people with 3 digit ratings
You're a 1600 player.. You're not Magnus. You can make a mistake even if it's a losing position for the other person. Pretty arrogant of you to think they should resign.
This is great
I understand that you don't like people that don't resign when they have lost allready. But your oppenent can allways try something else. Winning on time or getting draw on other ways is a good alternitive when you are lost. But when you want your oppenent to surrender is the same as surrender against Magnus Carlsen before the first move is played. You know you can't win. But you play for the experience and for the fun. You wouldn't play chess if you didn't liked it.
Losing in won possitions is not funny but an oppenent surrendering before the first move isn't funny to.
And when your oppenent wins after a lost position you have a good game. Good for analysis. And you will learn of that. Later when you are very good you will thank that people don't surrender because you learned of it.
(Sorry for the mistakes. I am not very good at English)
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
Or with four knights, in the middle of the board
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
My exact thoughts
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
Maybe if you were a no-brained noob you would do that....
Kinglysack...that is the greatest end game of all time in the history of chess!
SECOND ONLY TO CAPABLANCA
KID_Harish wrote:
hello
What do you think about them? What to do about them? When I am a Queen up and winning position my opponent DO NO RESIGN!
Frustrating...
kinglysack wrote:
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
Maybe if you were a no-brained noob you would do that....
OMG! WHY???
SonOfThunder2 wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
Maybe if you were a no-brained noob you would do that....
OMG! WHY???
cause he wasnt resigning. Thats what this thread is all about.
kinglysack wrote:
SonOfThunder2 wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
Maybe if you were a no-brained noob you would do that....
OMG! WHY???
cause he wasnt resigning. Thats what this thread is all about.
I'm glad you have the extra 20 min to waste when he see's that you are going to promote every damn pawn and lets his clock run out instead of resigning. Have it your way. lol
SonOfThunder2 wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
SonOfThunder2 wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
coolshot wrote:
kinglysack wrote:
When they dont resign you just make five queens and mate with a king move
...........efficient play with mating material is best .....by going OTT with multitudinous pawns graduating to Queens, Knights Bishops and/or Rooks risks inadvertently stalemating your tardy opponent with careless inappropriate confidence......then you'd be pissed !!!
Maybe if you were a no-brained noob you would do that....
OMG! WHY???
cause he wasnt resigning. Thats what this thread is all about.
I'm glad you have the extra 20 min to waste when he see's that you are going to promote every damn pawn and lets his clock run out instead of resigning. Have it your way. lol
lol bruh it was like two more minutes. I wouldnt waste 20 minutes
I consider resigning here... but i pulled out the "W".
I don't resign