Save BronsteinPawn

Sort:
Avatar of IceApprentease

Would you want him to be unmuted? I'll vote for yes because he was a really funny troll.

Votes:

Yes - 8

No - 1

Average Yeses: 5

Avatar of ilikewindmills
1
Avatar of Shinkuuzz

Yes

Avatar of IceApprentease

The Average Yeses are the difference between the yes and no.

Avatar of justlikechess

No way, he is better off muted!

Avatar of General-TsoTso

unmute brownstainpawn, just give the forums to the trolls and start a new set of forums for proper members.

Avatar of Jenium

Yes from me. Is he still muted?

Avatar of ArgoNavis

1st Ammendment, I say.

 

 

inb4 somebody says it doesn't apply to a private website.

Avatar of DrSpudnik

Why was he muted?

Avatar of FM_Checkmate

I want Bronstein to be unmuted!

Avatar of FM_Checkmate
justlikechess wrote:

No way, he is better off muted!

surprise.png Why?

Avatar of General-TsoTso

He is unmuted in about 15 sockpuppets.

Avatar of fuzzbug

phpEE5rkz.jpeg

Avatar of CookedQueen
General-TsoTso wrote:

unmute brownstainpawn, just give the forums to the trolls and start a new set of forums for proper members.

One forum for the trolls and one for failed trolls (what you call proper members)?

Doesn't work. Every group will devide after a while into real trolls and wanna be trolls. Then the same question occurs again.

Avatar of General-TsoTso

no, the proper members are the regular human beings.

the trolls would keep getting relegated back to the troll divisions.

Avatar of LogoCzar

Also relevant:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-players/petition-to-unmute-bronsteinpawn

Avatar of CookedQueen

Doens't matter how you call or define the group. Someday a homogeneous group will devide and split apart as I said before. That's just the nature of any society.

Avatar of General-TsoTso

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

Avatar of CookedQueen
General-TsoTso wrote:

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

Attitude? Lol, facts of social behavior has nothing to do with attitude.

Avatar of ArgoNavis
General-TsoTso wrote:

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

Are we talking about the same website?