Which Elite Chess Player of All Time Has the Most Natural Talent?

Fact is i personally believe Fischer and Kasparov both would be extremly successful no matter what profession they would have chosen.

Definitely, I agree.

I don't know who is the most talented.  As you said it's impossible to know.  But I think Fischer should be mentioned in the list.

Up untill his won World Title Match, Fischer's life is quite well documented and known. You can read it in Brady's books, in particular, based on written documents and accounts directly taken by the writer from first hand witnesses (when he himself is not the direct witness).

If you mean nobody can be sure about what Fischer did in his private appartment, where he lived alone from the age sixteen, that is also true for anybody else, really, since we all have some time in private in our life, and studying Chess is at least partially done alone by everybody.

On the other hand, nothing about Fischer's life which might have happened after 1972 is relevant for this thread's topic.

You are just arrogant and igmorant. 

From my many therads you know that I lived in Soviet Union. You must also know that I know more than you about chess which includes its history.

 Have you ever been in Russia or any of the parts of former Soviet Union, at least after 1991 ? Then you would know that life in Soviet Union was not easy. Many players (including most GMs) lived in a small apartment, did not have a car, not few in the big cities had to share a kitchen with other families.

Travel even to other socialist countries was rare, even the SuperGMs who got invitations to tournaments in the West, depended on a decision of the Sport Committee in Moscow (many requests for such travels were declined , even for players like Bronstein, Boleslavski, Spasski etc...). The salary for a GM was not great, too. The only thing of what you say that is true is, that strong players (IMs or high-rated players) could work as a trainer in a Chess club, or as a chess teacher in one of the the 'Pioneer's Palaces'. Again, only this gave them a financially safe situation, but in the overwhelming number of cases it did not make them a rich person (rich from the point of view of western lifestyle).

So the advantage that soviet chess players had compared to the westerners was two-fold:

1. Receiving attention and respect by a big part of the people - chess players were considered as artists and scientists at the same time.

2. Being part of a large and vibrant  chess community where one would have lots of creative impulses.

Coming back to Fischer: he played countless tournaments within the US and abroad before he reached his strongest shape in the seventieth.

A freedom that no Soviet player ever enjoyed.

You simply stated that there is "no doubt" that Fischer was the greatest talent ever, I guess that is plain facts instead of assumptions. :-) I don't claim that Kasparov was "better", I just pointed out some differences between the two with regards to their interests.

no kidding sometimes i really forget what i wrote myself. Good point, you are a very good listener ;)

Tootsie, you also (deliberately) forget what other people have already explained, lol.  

I dont know what 1991 has to do with anything, but as i read travel was ok and allowed, even Kasparov mentioned it in an interview.

Even many russians at Botvinnik time said travel was allowed, only not for those who Botvinnik disliked (according to some statements)

Many travelled  inside soviet union, because they probably all had to travel to the all soviet championship.

Bronstein even in his book mentioned how many things he always brought home from frequent trips to foreign countries, especially his frequent visits to holland.

Korchnoi and others (i believe it was Korchnoi) even gave Bronstein advise on what he should buy when he is outside of soviet union.

Apparently for soviet standard chessplayers were rich.

not to mention how often Tal was abroad, Tals trips were famous, Schlechter you totally made everything up.

No wonder pfren doesnt want to talk to you.

Well, if you belive that a world class GM asking another one to bring something home from the other side of the iron curtain is a signal of how free were all them to travel the world, and of how rich were they all, what can one say to you, then?

Have a nice day, and good luck!

compared to other soviet citizen they were like gods for sure

J R Capablanca

So which top player of all time had the least natural talent then? Korchnoi?

Capablanca, Sultan Khan, Morphy, Anand. Carlsen, too, I think. 

Capablanca (the machine) He would enter a won endgame and leave you wondering where in the middle game that it took place or play the endgame like a violin with a couple of extra strings. 

there is a famous interview by Bobby Fischer where he said Capablanca made idiotic statements, like from here i played the endgame perfectly what according to Bobby Fischer he didnt.

Also he mentioned how weak players mentioned that Capablanca always found the right moves in seconds, even though they even were to weak to know what the right move was (ofc i dont mean Botvinnik)

no like event abitrage investor like Andy Beal, like Buy out company i forget the name, the ones that buy companies with credit and then sell it to the public with 100 million profit to every partner of the firm..

like stock trader or stuff like that.