Which Elite Chess Player of All Time Has the Most Natural Talent?

Sort:
Talfan1

OKIDOKI TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TA TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL dammit whats next oh yesTAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL TAL

alberto_huerta

Natural talent, but the son of a talent usually is not a talent.

Maybe person not (less) disturbed on early age.

There are a lot of talented men in fantasy (lol).

bigpoison
nameno1had wrote:
TKACHS wrote:

Some say that Anatoly Karpov was the closest to the kernel of the essence of what chess is about. Yet they complain about that boring top flight consistency of his games in the 70s & 80s. Learned this fact from baseball when Henry Aaron broke all the lifetime career hitting records passing the over touted careers of other not so durable heroes.

 

 
In 1923, Babe Ruth broke the record for most home runs in a season. That same year, he also broke the record for highest batting average. There is a third record he broke that year that most people don't know about: In 1923, Babe Ruth struck out more times than any other player in Major League Baseball.
 
I liken this to looking at certain players' styles in chess. You have to make certain concessions in order to obtain the benefits you think will give you the advantage to win. Tal did this. Petrosian and Karpov also, each in their own way.



Come again?  The Babe never even came close to challenging for the all time batting average record.

Crazychessplaya

BP is correct; even the shoeless guy had a higher batting average.

bigpoison

To be fair, it looks like 'noone' came by his erroneous information honestly:

http://sinekpartners.typepad.com/refocus/2010/03/are-you-willing-to-strike-out.html

bigpoison

He was an exceptional leftie, but greatest pitcher ever?  No way!  That was Morphy!

chuckfloyd2011

Well, if you look at who did it without a coach and without a computer, and never had a team of seconds for advice, and even when he did have a second, wouldn't let the second analyze the position, it would be Fischer. I don't know if that describes talent, but it definately describes lone determination. Fischer did it by himself, he wasn't a cheater.

duck29

fabiano caruana

SocialPanda
chuckfloyd2011 wrote:

Well, if you look at who did it without a coach and without a computer, and never had a team of seconds for advice, and even when he did have a second, wouldn't let the second analyze the position, it would be Fischer. I don't know if that describes talent, but it definately describes lone determination. Fischer did it by himself, he wasn't a cheater.

Are you calling cheaters to some GMs?

Xirehzin

Capablanca

soothsayer8

Capablanca, Morphy or Fischer.

After that, probably Tal and Carlsen.

soothsayer8
[COMMENT DELETED]
nameno1had
 
bigpoison wrote:
nameno1had wrote:
TKACHS wrote:

Some say that Anatoly Karpov was the closest to the kernel of the essence of what chess is about. Yet they complain about that boring top flight consistency of his games in the 70s & 80s. Learned this fact from baseball when Henry Aaron broke all the lifetime career hitting records passing the over touted careers of other not so durable heroes.

 

 
In 1923, Babe Ruth broke the record for most home runs in a season. That same year, he also broke the record for highest batting average. There is a third record he broke that year that most people don't know about: In 1923, Babe Ruth struck out more times than any other player in Major League Baseball.
 
I liken this to looking at certain players' styles in chess. You have to make certain concessions in order to obtain the benefits you think will give you the advantage to win. Tal did this. Petrosian and Karpov also, each in their own way.



Come again?  The Babe never even came close to challenging for the all time batting average record.

I wasn't saying that the Babe was one of the best pure hitters like Rogers Hornsby or Ted Williams. What I am saying is that Babe could take advantage of the pitches and situations, because he was a really good hitter. Sure he was a power hitter that pulled his fair share out of the shorter porch in right, but I wouldn't consider him a pull hitter.

After going over dozens and more of game recaps in the news archives, he had a fair share to RCF, center and a fair number to left.

A few teams did put a shift on Ruth but unlike most hitters today who fight the shift, Ruth would at times hit to the left side, the shifts had a short life.

Not only hit to left but at times lay down a bunt One time bunted safely twice in the same game. There are around 40 bunts he laid down, most safe hits.
There could be debates, why lay one down, the other team would rather give Babe a bunt single. Don't agree with that, yes you could take him away from the home run to RF but still, your almost giving him a gift hit, man on base.

Some interesting facts to back up what I am saying. Babe Ruth was a good pitcher :

Babe Ruth Career Pitching Stats – Part 1 of 3

    
                                   W    L     ERA    GP    GS   CG   GF  SVS  SOS
                      
1914     BOS Red Sox     2      1     3.91     4     3       1     0     0     0
1915     BOS Red Sox     18     8     2.44    32    28    16    3      1     0
1916     BOS Red Sox     23     12   1.75    44    41     23    3     9     1
1917     BOS Red Sox     24     13   2.01    41    38     35    3     6     2
1918     BOS Red Sox     13     7     2.22    20    19    18     0     1     0

Pretty darn good stats for any pitcher. He must have been a pretty good hitter in order for them to take a guy who had so stats that would make pitchers today drool.

BTW, Babe Ruth, career .342 hitter. Including seasons of .376, .378, .393, .378 again, .372, .356, .359, .373 ..... only 5 times in his 22 seasons did he fail to hit atleast .300 and was close on two of those occassions. Is my assertions still really unfounded in your eyes ?

 

 

                                       
SubNY

how about anand - he had lightning speed

chesshole

maybe alekhine

the400blows
chesshole wrote:

maybe alekhine

I don't think so. He worked to get good. See Silman's recent article on chess.com.

WalangAlam

It has to be the youngest GM in the world Karjarkin. He defeated Kasparov when he was still 13 yrs old at Reggio Emilia if I'm not mistaken.

SocialPanda

Wei Yi

SocialPanda
WalangAlam wrote:

It has to be the youngest GM in the world Karjarkin. He defeated Kasparov when he was still 13 yrs old at Reggio Emilia if I'm not mistaken.

I couldn´t find a Kasparov - Karjakin game. If you can, please post it.

Yereslov
socialista wrote:
WalangAlam wrote:

It has to be the youngest GM in the world Karjarkin. He defeated Kasparov when he was still 13 yrs old at Reggio Emilia if I'm not mistaken.

I couldn´t find a Kasparov - Karjakin game. If you can, please post it.

Karjakin would have been too young to play Kasparov.