7 Chess

Dear chess lovers, hello everyone.
For a long time I have had the bottom subject in my mind .
Name: 7 Chess - (or Team Chess)
The game is a chess game played in two teams of 7 people.
Distribution of tasks in teams;
C: (Captain player) He is the captain and manager of the team.
Duties :
 - During the game, it indicates the team to play for one of the other 6 teammates, while it is his turn to move. For example, when he says Bishop, the teammate responsible for Bishop moves the Bishop. It can NEVER say, for example, Bxc4.
- Cannot request a move from a teammate, which would result in an impossible move. For example, when it says pawns, it will be an error if pawns or pawns cannot play. He can't do that.
- He has the responsibility of the tie or abandonment.
- the important point is that which piece he asks his teammates to move, only his name. NEVER indicate his move. He says Bishop, says Rook, says King, says Queen ... but doesn't indicate his move. The move is in the teammate responsible for that stone.
K: King player
Duties :
- The C (captain) player makes the move of the King when he says King. This move can be in large or small castling.
- The task of castling large or small belongs to the King.
- He has the choice to play the king or castling
Q: Queen player
Duties :
- Player C (captain) makes the Queen's move when he says Queen.
R: Player of the rooks
Duties :
- C (captain) player moves one of his rooks when he says rook.
B: Player of the bishops
Duties :
- When the player C (captain) calls Bishop, he makes the move of one of his bishops.
N: The player of the knights
Duties :
- When the player C (captain) says knight, he makes the move of one of his knights.
P: Player of pawns
Duties :
- When the player C (captain) says Pawn, he moves one of his pawns.
- It is up to him to decide what to take and the promoted pawn in passing.
As a result;
Can't this chess game format be played in halls or online?
I envision the atmosphere of the game in my head like this;
There are two teams of 7 people. There are 7 players in each team who have the possibility to interpret the game differently and turn to different solutions.
Let's think of it this way, C (captain player) notices an attack that starts with the Bishop sacrifice and predicts a definitive result in his own way.
The Bishop says .. The bishop player does not see this sacrifice and makes another bishop move.
Conversely, C (captain) does not see the bishop sacrifice attack or is not convinced that results will be achieved,
It says Bishop but it is normal and waiting for another bishop move .. You see, Bishops player sacrificed the bishop, his own result comes out .. but maybe it's lost ..
I will say this; think dynamism, dynamism, do you know?
(this is just an example, such examples can be reproduced.)
Surprises find life and action again .. isn't it exciting?
Best regards