Thank you for the diagram, Ry. Yes, if we take his Knight with our Queen, and then there is the continuation you showed, he just keeps losing from there, while we can Queen Build, and then he's in sorry shape.
martin0 vs the world: World analysis thread
Sort:
Yeah whoops I completely missed 16...Bf5. It's very annoying that we have to make a capturing move. But your continuation looks good Ry.
But I think 19...Bxf8 is slightly better than 19...Rxf8 for Martin.
rychessmaster1 wrote:
Nh6 is actually illegal... the bishop is free.
landontu wrote:
We can just take the bishop on f5, right?
Yeah but then Nh6 wins the queen. We will still be up an exchange and a pawn and be winning easily though
rychessmaster1 wrote:
You forgot about queen building here, Ry... We'd be up a queen for 2 knights. This is actually the best case scenario for us.
But without Qxc5, white has a very hard time winning. If Bxf8 instead for example, Nxf5 Bxg7 Kxg7 and his knights are so active that we might not even be winning
Aug 5, 2020
0
#247
i don't get this game.... post 282 move 18 Qf3 simply winning by a queen?
Chess_Pro2 wrote:
It's good that Bf5 isn't a threat, then. (After 17.Qxf5, 17...Bxc3 is forced.)
So you didn't miss anything.
Yeah whoops I completely missed 16...Bf5. It's very annoying that we have to make a capturing move. But your continuation looks good Ry.
rkdkchess wrote:
It's an event called, "Pawn Grabber."
If there's a hanging pawn that cannot be recaptured, you MUST capture something. Very similar to checkers.
i don't get this game.... post 282 move 18 Qf3 simply winning by a queen?
Aug 5, 2020
0
#250
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
rkdkchess wrote:
It's an event called, "Pawn Grabber." If there's a hanging pawn that cannot be recaptured, you MUST capture something. Very similar to checkers.
i don't get this game.... post 282 move 18 Qf3 simply winning by a queen?
thx makes more sense now
Martin wouldn't take c3, even because it is forced.
He'd resign.
So, no worries about Bf5.
I think we won.
I apologize for not doing much these days. The events were confusing me so I didn't really wanted to vote a move.
YAY!
ok
haoming09 wrote:
Similar account for me, except I'm just too lazy to do more than point out incorrect analysis.
I apologize for not doing much these days. The events were confusing me so I didn't really wanted to vote a move.
hi 
What's up?
Na3
We can just take the bishop on f5, right?