Mole Chess Game

Sort:
Chess_Condor

I didn't, originally you needed a majority to vote someone in no matter what. But then we decided it would be unfair to the commoner because they would never be able to vote the mole out if they voted out the wrong person. For that reason we made it you only need one vote on a two person team.

Chess_Condor

Next voting phase I could vote you back in just by myself, but this voting phase I could not.

Asparagusic_acids
Chess_Condor wrote:

I didn't, originally you needed a majority to vote someone in no matter what. But then we decided it would be unfair to the commoner because they would never be able to vote the mole out if they voted out the wrong person. For that reason we made it you only need one vote on a two person team.

One person voted, they got the majority of the vote.

Chess_Condor

I don't want to be unfair here. If everyone else assumed the rule was the way @Asparagusic_acids interpreted it to be I will let him on the team, but that was not how I intended it to be.

Tja_05

What? No.

Chess_Condor
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

What? No.

Ok, I thought I made it clear. I understand it would have been more confusing if you joined the game later. Otherwise moles would vote moles on the team in an infinite loop. 

Tja_05

Chess_Condor wrote:

I don't want to be unfair here. If everyone else assumed the rule was the way @Asparagusic_acids interpreted it to be I will let him on the team, but that was not how I intended it to be.

No objections here. That's on you guys.

Asparagusic_acids

If one person votes in a election, then the winner decided by the person who voted.

Tja_05

Chess_Condor wrote:

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

What? No.

Ok, I thought I made it clear. I understand it would have been more confusing if you joined the game later. Otherwise moles would vote moles on the team in an infinite loop. 

I was responding to Acids's post.

Chess_Condor

I'm sorry but that is the rules. Otherwise you and Dax could just vote eachother in every round until the end of the game.

Chess_Condor
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Chess_Condor wrote:

 

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

What? No.

Ok, I thought I made it clear. I understand it would have been more confusing if you joined the game later. Otherwise moles would vote moles on the team in an infinite loop. 

 

I was responding to Acids's post.

 

So you think Acid should be back in the game?

Tja_05

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

If one person votes in a election, then the winner decided by the person who voted.

That's not how this.works. You need two people to vote positive. Otherwise, @TheGreatAttorney would have been off of the team by now.

Chess_Condor

Yes, I agree. The two person vote-in was an exception to the rules.

Tja_05

Chess_Condor wrote:

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Chess_Condor wrote:

 

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

What? No.

Ok, I thought I made it clear. I understand it would have been more confusing if you joined the game later. Otherwise moles would vote moles on the team in an infinite loop. 

 

I was responding to Acids's post.

 

So you think Acid should be back in the game?

I'm not sure it's fair that he's not in, but I'm not going to try to influence your team's matters.

Asparagusic_acids

In your rules it never says majority of the team.

Chess_Condor

Ok, I guess we will take a poll to see if Acids should be back in the game. Everyone else may have understood the rules differently then me.

Chess_Condor

Everyone please vote on your interpretation of the rules:

1) You need 2 people on a 3 person team to vote someone in:

2) You only need 1 person on a 3 person team to vote someone in:

3) Option 1 is the correct rule, but the rules were vague and Acids should be allowed to join black team:

 

Chess_Condor

Please vote unbiasedly. Just vote on what you thought the rule was. If option 2 gets a majority Acids will be on black team.

NotGeneralGrant

I vote 1.

Asparagusic_acids

2