Bc5
Mole Chess Game
Sort:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
To be frank, it's because you're extremely talkative. I think you may be trying to drop subtle hints through chat.
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
To be frank, one who is loquacious will reveal his self efficacy; hence, by speaking gibberish, I am revealing all that should not be revealed. (Insert arbitrary gibberish text)
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
To be frank, it's because you're extremely talkative. I think you may be trying to drop subtle hints through chat.
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
Why would a mole want to drop subtle hints? That is the last thing I would try to do as a mole.
@NotGeneralGrant your move.
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
Are you sure about that?
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
To be frank, it's because you're extremely talkative. I think you may be trying to drop subtle hints through chat.
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
Why would a mole want to drop subtle hints? That is the last thing I would try to do as a mole.
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
To be frank, it's because you're extremely talkative. I think you may be trying to drop subtle hints through chat.
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
Why would a mole want to drop subtle hints? That is the last thing I would try to do as a mole.
Well, as a mole, that would be first and foremost thing I would like to do. Anyone who disagrees is a non-empathetic entity.
Chess_Condor wrote:
@NotGeneralGrant your move.
No, it's Black's move. I'm on the white team.
My bad, @TheGreatAttorney your move.
Be7
@NotGeneralGrant your turn.
d4
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
Are you sure about that?
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
To be frank, it's because you're extremely talkative. I think you may be trying to drop subtle hints through chat.
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
I vote to remove NotGeneralGrant. This was my original thought as to whom the mole is.
You think it's me? Why? Oh well. My play will exonerate me.
Why would a mole want to drop subtle hints? That is the last thing I would try to do as a mole.
Absolutely. Subtle hints would be just as likely to be caught by you and Darklord instead of the Black team.
If someone is voted out , leaving 2 players, I believe that shortens the vote frequency to every 4 moves, in which case action can be taken even more quickly.
It would stay every 12 moves between votes because both votes are held at the same time.
That doesn't make sense. The rule is 2 move rotations. 2 move rotations for 2 players is 4 moves. Likewise, for 4 players, it would be 8 moves. There is no need to hold voting for both teams at the same time.
We could do voting individually by team, but I think that would just add for unnecessary breaks. We would have to stop the game phase for both sides every four or six moves. This just seems to often for my liking, but it's up to all of you. What does everyone think, hold both sides votes at the same time or make them individual?