This is nothing like real chess 
pretty crazy concept.
Here's mine which is playable on chess.com customs https://www.chess.com/join/dragonanga
My new chess variant - similar to standard chess
Sort:
Oct 1, 2022
0
#2
Oct 5, 2022
0
#3
Have you heard of Enigma Chess? Enigma chess is a chess variation that incorporates a new piece, the enigma piece. Each player assigns his own chosen power to one enigma piece and both players then have corresponding pieces. More details on this in the thread . . . But here is a big question: Is the classical chess board setup flawless? Here's why I ask, and the answer may not be black or white, but both black and white: Why should white's kingside castling be to the right, but black's to the left? I see an unevenness in the game here. But if kings faced queens, both sides would castle perfectly even. It's not black or white . . . If two right-handed, or two left-handed players play, why should kings not face queens, and kingside castling be perfectly even (to the same side from each player's perspective?) Here are my thoughts on it: Let's say two armed men, both right-handed, or both left-handed, face each other, and both are carrying both a shield and a sword. When they face each other, will swords face swords, or will swords face shields? But let's say a left-handed man faces a right-handed man, will swords then face shields, or will swords face swords and shields face shields? Or if two couples, two kings and a queens, walk up to one another, both having their partner on the same side, when they face each other, will kings face kings, or will they face the queens directly? Now why one cannot just shoot down what I'm asking about is because a game like chess involves two people. A car resembles a human in many ways because it is designed to be used by a human and thus needs to mirror many things the human driver's body performs. So a car has 'eyes' (lights), a 'mouth' (the horn), a 'heart' (the engine), 'blood' (the fuel), 'feet' (the wheels), 'eyelids' (windscreen wipers) etc... In the same way, chess is a reflection of the players. So if two right-handed, or two left-handed players play, why should the classical board setup not be as mentioned earlier, in view of these arguments? But if a left-handed player plays a right-handed player, I'd leave it just as it is. Yet even so, black should still have the chance to move first. Hmmm.... Your thoughts?
Initial position:
The setup is exactly like in standard chess except that the Kings will switch their places.
Purpose:
The ultimate purpose for White is to bring his King to the first rank without getting checkmated and Black will try to bring his King to the eighth rank without getting checkmated
General rules:
1. The Kings will not be under a check in the initial position for being on the enemy side. (for example, in the initial position it shall be deemed that the Queen on d1 is not checking the King on e1)
2. The respective Kings shall not make a first move which is a capture in any part of the game.
(in the given case Kxd1 or Kxf7 is not permitted if it is the King’s first move)
3. The King’s first move shall be to a square which is not under a check.
4. Once the King has made its first move, it shall be free to capture any piece/pawn that is undefended.
5. Only after the King has made its first move the opponent shall be allowed to check/checkmate the King.
6. The Kings shall never be permitted to be placed on squares immediately next to each other as in standard chess.
7. Castling (kingside/queenside) is permitted. For example White moves his Rook to f1 and the King to g1. This will be considered as White’s move although he places the Black King on g1. This is possible only if the Rook has not been previously moved by White and the King by Black. It shall be deemed that Black has not yet made a King move through White’s castling.
Note:
The variant can also be tried using any of the chess960 positions
Waiting for your feedback. Thank you!