If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Two too quick ends
Sort:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Not really. I don't have a good feeling for chess 360 games. Neither of your opponents seemed to have any clue either.
Why don't you post a game that shows some skill on both sides?
notmtwain wrote:
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Not really. I don't have a good feeling for chess 360 games. Neither of your opponents seemed to have any clue either.
Why don't you post a game that shows some skill on both sides?
Thank you. But these are just crazy ends with quick conclusion.
notmtwain wrote:
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Not really. I don't have a good feeling for chess 360 games. Neither of your opponents seemed to have any clue either.
Why don't you post a game that shows some skill on both sides?
Can you please re-edit Chess960 in stead of chess 360?
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Not really. I don't have a good feeling for chess 360 games. Neither of your opponents seemed to have any clue either.
Why don't you post a game that shows some skill on both sides?
Can you please re-edit Chess960 in stead of chess 360?
That last game was a little more interesting. Here, I will help you by posting it in the thread:
I feel like your opponent had good chances in the game and was playing more actively than you, developing more pieces and that you won only after the d and e files came open.
As far as your other requests, editing what I wrote won't help attract viewers to your thread.
Since this is your thread, you can re-edit the title of the thread to include the words "Chess 960". ( I can't edit the title of your thread.)
You can also edit any of your posts to include the actual viewable games. People don't like following links to view games.
You will probably attract more views that way from people who like that type of chess.
notmtwain wrote:
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
Mahaaveera wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
If you want people to look at them, post them here.
Were you not entertained by the quick ends?
Not really. I don't have a good feeling for chess 360 games. Neither of your opponents seemed to have any clue either.
Why don't you post a game that shows some skill on both sides?
Can you please re-edit Chess960 in stead of chess 360?
That last game was a little more interesting. Here, I will help you by posting it in the thread:
I feel like your opponent had good chances in the game and was playing more actively than you, developing more pieces and that you won only after the d and e files came open.
You can also edit any of your posts to include the actual viewable games. People don't like following links to view games.
You will probably attract more views that way from people who like that type of chess.
Thanks for your comment and suggestion.
It's true that the opponent had better pieces developed. But actually I was forseeing a mate d7 square which he could guess. So the game went on.
I would like to keep the link for further reference. I lost my interest in keeping the viewable games. Please bear this on my part.
Capturing the king by developing
the pieces towards helpless king.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=112457446
Game I
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=103293790
Game II
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=103293846