I was tempted to comment on the cheating angle too, but I've deleted it because it's against the rules to discuss that here.
THE GE-WINNER IS DESTROYED; AGAIN.
Sort:
I made a thread in the cheating forum as a more relevant place to discuss suspect/not suspect ratings of such people.
On terms of the argument that higher-rated players should see lesser punishments for things like vandalising clubs; be aware that clubs facilitate many chess events.
Having more space for chess events for many low-rated (or high-rated) players is more important than the playing strength of one player.
There's been a number of well established admins of major teams who's been banned for either fair play or abuse. Chess.com doesn't care who you are, if they are confident they have cause to close your account, they will.
Ximoon wrote:
There's been a number of well established admins of major teams who's been banned for either fair play or abuse. Chess.com doesn't care who you are, if they are confident they have causse too close your account, they will.
right on point
None of these 2k people are even real,
They play 5 games using stockfish, stop playing to avoid cheat detection, the patrol the forums offering advice from their faked superior playing ability
I have never touched an engine...
Indeed, and you have played over a thousand Rapid games.
yes... and about 150 uscf tournaments... my rating in uscf is 2028...