Kaynight talks to cleverbot:
A comparison of chess.com with other sites
Sort:
lol... the bot thinks saying "get over it" is very rude, but doesn't mind being told "FU."
It also doesn't mind being called an idiot:
Cleverbot: So then , tell me about something I don't know.
User: You're an idiot.
Cleverbot: Yes , I knew that.
Jun 4, 2017
0
#25
I have successfully trolled macer75 into derailing his own thread. I win.
Jun 4, 2017
0
#26
I'm going to tell CrystalMoon about a mod that uses its influence to troll and derail threads. I win.
My Words are written in Red like Jesus H Christ , So I Win !
macer75 wrote:
It also doesn't mind being called an idiot:
Cleverbot: So then , tell me about something I don't know.
User: You're an idiot.
Cleverbot: Yes , I knew that.
RofL!
# 28... what is the "H" in his name?
ThePEPSIChallenge wrote:
# 28... what is the "H" in his name?
An alternative to Jesus Christ. The H is added due to numerous reasons. Some say it stood for Holy, some say it stood for Harold because of, "Our Father, who art in heaven, Harold be thy name". Other theories about the origin of the H. is:
1. H stood for Haploid since Jesus has no human father.
2. It recalls the H in the IHS logo emblazoned on much Christian paraphernalia. IHS dates from the earliest years of Christianity, being an abbreviation of "Jesus" in classical Greek characters. The Greek pronunciation is "Iesous," with the E sound being represented by the character eta, which looks like an H. When the symbol passed to Christian Romans, for whom an H was an H, the unaccountable character eventually became accepted as Jesus's middle initial.
3. H derives from the taunting Latin inscription INRH that was supposedly tacked on the cross by Roman soldiers: Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Hebrei (Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Hebrews). Trouble is, the inscription is usually given as INRI: Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum (J.C., King of the Jews).
Jesus H. Christ is an expression just as "Jesus Christ" Only with an H added in, most likely for humor.
1. H stood for Haploid since Jesus has no human father.
2. It recalls the H in the IHS logo emblazoned on much Christian paraphernalia. IHS dates from the earliest years of Christianity, being an abbreviation of "Jesus" in classical Greek characters. The Greek pronunciation is "Iesous," with the E sound being represented by the character eta, which looks like an H. When the symbol passed to Christian Romans, for whom an H was an H, the unaccountable character eventually became accepted as Jesus's middle initial.
3. H derives from the taunting Latin inscription INRH that was supposedly tacked on the cross by Roman soldiers: Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Hebrei (Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Hebrews). Trouble is, the inscription is usually given as INRI: Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum (J.C., King of the Jews).
Jesus H. Christ is an expression just as "Jesus Christ" Only with an H added in, most likely for humor.
"Jesus H. Christ! My plunger broke!"
unbelievably sad to slap such a name as a joke. Perhaps it's a good reason why it says not to use such a name in vain.
I forgive you, but I'm not the one that asked it not to be done.
And I have never called my Dad father because mine is the CREATOR of ALL Life.
ThePEPSIChallenge wrote:
unbelievably sad to slap such a name as a joke. Perhaps it's a good reason why it says not to use such a name in vain.
I forgive you, but I'm not the one that asked it not to be done.
And I have never called my Dad father because mine is the CREATOR of ALL Life.
Thats Cool, i did not mean it in a Derogatory Manner, and If it is a Sin, let me feel the condemnation, i dont need your Harrassment. Dont ask Questions not wanting the answer then play the game of twister in the aftermatch Pal....
how is forgiving you harassment??
ThePEPSIChallenge wrote:
how is forgiving you harassment??
Trying to condemn me while forgiving me is nothing short of playing God Yourself.
Who do you think you are, Jesus H Christ ?
lets change the subject, and keep the topic of the thread intact, sorry if I offended You or your Lord...
Chess.com vs. Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator
Pro: Has some content that is not nonsensical.
Con:
Guns? Absence of religion? Lack of self-esteem? Poor parenting? The entertainment industry? Who's to blame for Chess.com 's snarky reportages? Numerous professionals (and not-so-professionals) have speculated and mulled, publicly and privately, over what has caused Chess.com to make our lives miserable. Let's get down to business: He has produced a large number of snotty, lackadaisical initiatives. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that Chess.com has been misdirecting our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of vulgar presentism. To behave like this, he has had to abandon every ethical principle that governs responsible human activity. Perhaps such ruthlessness comes easily to him given that he should not reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Not now, not ever.
I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to preach a message of community and brotherly love. Don't let yourself be buffaloed by Chess.com. Don't let yourself be persuaded to believe that alcoholism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society just because a lot of shabby enemies of the people happen to believe that. Analyze the arguments for yourself and see if you agree with my claim that Chess.com says that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. Such statements are not just wrong; they're worse than wrong. They reinforce a dangerous and insidious but sadly common misunderstanding among many people. They disguise the fact that I have some of his periphrastic missives in front of me right now. In one of them, Chess.com proclaims that students should be molded into “change agents” to promote his backwards, flippant agenda. If you don't find that shocking then consider that the worst sorts of gloomy slumlords there are often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Chess.com enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to intensify or perpetuate careerism.
Residents of other countries are awed that a person so wedded to philistinism can rise to such prominence here. I do not say that lightly. Remember, Chess.com is totally versipellous. When he's among plebeians, Chess.com warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against Bulverism. But when Chess.com is safely surrounded by his factotums, he instructs them to vend a scornful mixture of Pyrrhonism and superstition to a new generation of querulous barrators. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Chess.com so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? If you assert that prisons exist not for punitive or rehabilitative purposes but rather to carry out a perverted political agenda against minorities and the poor then you won't understand my answer no matter how carefully I explain it. You won't understand my answer if you maintain that you and I are objects for Chess.com to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. However, you have a chance at understanding my answer if you're open-minded enough to realize that in a tacit concession of defeat, Chess.com is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his repugnant, condescending grievances have failed at. Let me end this letter with a call to action. Please join those of us who are balkanizing Chess.com 's obdurate resistentialism society into an etiolated and sapless agglomeration, and through your support we will love the Earth and everything that flowers and crawls upon it. Together we will create a tension in the mind so that individuals can rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal. Together we will rise to the challenge of thwarting Chess.com's nocuous plans.
I have a Degree in Creative Journalism from the Lords of Flatbush
Set in 1958, the coming-of-age story follows four Brooklyn teenagers known as The Lords of Flatbush. The Lords chase girls, steal cars, play pool and hang out at a local malt shop. The film focuses on Chico (Perry King) attempting to win over Jane (Susan Blakely), a girl who wants little to do with him, and Stanley (Sylvester Stallone), who impregnates his girlfriend, Frannie (Maria Smith), who pressures him to marry her. Stanley agrees to marry her, even after finding out before the wedding that Frannie never was pregnant. Butchey Weinstein (Henry Winkler) is highly intelligent but hides his brains behind a clownish front, while Wimpy Murgalo (Paul Mace) is a colorless follower in awe of Chico and Stanley.
MGleason wrote:
Some comparisons you left out: Myspace, Google, Apple.com, Cleverbot.com, xkcd.com...
lichess...
Chess.com vs yahoo
See chess.com vs hotmail
Chess.com vs Instagram
Pro: it isn't full of women showing their bodies.
Con: but it's full of fake women showing someone else's bodies.