I think I might have found a bug? When I checked my all time flags, it said I have 236 in 2,920 games, but the leaderboard says I have 236 flags in 272 games (86.8%), which is a lot higher than 236 flags in 2,920 games (8.08%) and puts me in 4th on the percentage leaderboard at the time of writing. The leaderboard shows that I have 272 games, which is about 9.32% of the total given when I checked my all time flags, and the leaderboard shows that @Hikaru has 7,995 games, which is about 11.8% of the total given when I checked his all time flags. So the leaderboard seems to be displaying about 10% of the real game total, unless I'm missing something due to the small number of accounts I checked. Please don't flame me if I turn out to be completely wrong.

Make a separate forum about it. In the Beta Group maybe?

maybe

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

97 dirty flags haha

Thanks

This is surprisingly accurate! Mine said: The Flagger 🚩

You don't flag on purpose — but you're definitely not upset when the clock does the work.

p.s. Apparently, I also have a roughly 2:1 ratio where I lose on time only once for every two games I win on time.

To be fair, the primary thesis behind playing lower-time controlled games is to calculate as fast as you possibly can... It's only logical to assume that if your opponent is running low on time, then they have substantially less time to calculate. Also, if my opponent would undoubtedly do it to me, then why would I not, in turn, do it to him? Me not doing it to others, and others not doing it to me, violates the integrity of the game in a sense.

It just says how many times you won/ lost on time.

a lot of time losses are from losing positions, so it doesn’t really measure flagging