I am aware of the thread you are highlighting and agree with a lot of what you are saying. However I’m not sure how many of the community guidelines have really been crossed.
Over moderation has been enforced far too long. Unless things are blatantly crossing lines shouldn’t a little leeway be given to see where it goes?
The worse thing about that thread is how they tried to get rid of it by burying it in the off topic section rather than just locking it. It’s almost like they wanted rid of it but didn’t want to have responsibility for locking it out right.
Recently I created a thread more or less about my observations on the current state of the forums. I put it in this very forum since it was a community issue. It was summarily (and incorrectly) moved to Off-Topic (as I'm sure this will be because they obviously can't help themselves).
In between the time I created that thread and now I've noticed a new trend in moderation or lack thereof. Threads with a glancing reference to the word (dare I type it?) ch***ing are locked as they appear (nothing new there however). Threads, other than RIPs memorializing members who'd been here 10 minutes and closed their accounts, that 1) are non-chess specific or 2) are uncomfortable are moved very quickly to Off Topic, which really isn't Off-topic but rather the Catch-All, or Toxic Waste Dump (as I referenced it elsewhere).
This isn't good moderation. This is, in fact, the opposite of good moderation.
Anyone who knows me knows I'm very much for properly moderated forums. A good illustration of the why is the very thread I mentioned in my opening sentence: The State of the Forums or Down the Rabbit Hole . Moderation has become bizarre is the main forums, but in the Off-Topic Forum it's become non-existent. So a thread about poor moderation has become one full of arguing, name-calling, politics and other things @Erik very specifically singled out as verboten:
Can anyone say irony?
Whoever is in charge (and I use the term loosely) has determined that @Erik is completely wrong and only cheating discussions need attention.
I now believe "rabbit hole' was simply too kind an allusion.