I’ve had enough. Chess.com’s move evaluation system is broken beyond repair. I just played the most galaxy-brain, 5D-chess, Stockfish-would-cry brilliant move of my life… and they had the AUDACITY to call it a good move.
I SACRIFICED a knight. A knight. Everyone knows sacrifices = brilliance. It’s like an unwritten chess law. But no, Chess.com decided my masterpiece was just “good.” Meanwhile, I’ve seen someone hang a queen and get a “brilliant” just because it accidentally led to mate.
How is this fair? How is this just? We need answers. We need justice.
I demand Chess.com fix their evaluation system ASAP or at least send me a written apology for disrespecting my genius.
Disgust.
But you were already "completely winning without it" and it wasn't the best move.
I’ve had enough. Chess.com’s move evaluation system is broken beyond repair. I just played the most galaxy-brain, 5D-chess, Stockfish-would-cry brilliant move of my life… and they had the AUDACITY to call it a good move.
I SACRIFICED a knight. A knight. Everyone knows sacrifices = brilliance. It’s like an unwritten chess law. But no, Chess.com decided my masterpiece was just “good.” Meanwhile, I’ve seen someone hang a queen and get a “brilliant” just because it accidentally led to mate.
How is this fair? How is this just? We need answers. We need justice.
I demand Chess.com fix their evaluation system ASAP or at least send me a written apology for disrespecting my genius.
Disgust.